Accompanied by supporters from across the country, the Wang (王) family from Taipei’s Shihlin District (士林) yesterday protested the city government’s deadline of Sunday for the family to raze its home to make way for a urban renewal project, calling the city government action illegal and unconstitutional.
“Over the past few years, we’ve had countless negotiations with the Taipei City Government, but it has not once been able to tell us what public interest is involved in the urban renewal case that concerns our family,” Wang Yao-teh (王耀德) told a news conference.
“Apparently, the government is working to defend the interests of the construction firm, not us ordinary citizens — unless the city government can tell us what the public interest of the project is, our struggle will continue,” he added.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
The Wang family lives in a -decades-old two-story building that it built on a plot of land it owns in a block along Wenlin Road (文林路) in Shilin, next to Wenlin Bridge.
The block where the Wang Family House was located was chosen by Le Young, a construction company, to build a 15-story high-rise apartment building as an urban renewal project.
Although the family has refused to give up its land, the construction firm has already received the consent of more than 75 percent of the landowners on the block, and according to the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例), the firm can now ask the city government to help it evict the Wangs and demolish their home.
The city government set Thursday last week as the deadline for the family to demolish the buildings, adding that failure to do so would force the city government to take action itself.
“Article 1 of the Urban Renewal Act states that urban renewal projects are meant to promote the planned redevelopment of land and revitalize urban areas for the purpose of enhancing the public interest,” said Chen Hung-ying (陳虹穎), a member of the Taiwan Alliance for the Victims of Urban Renewal.
“However, in this case, we do not see how allowing a construction firm to tear down houses already in existence and build a high-rise apartment building constitutes a public good,” Chen added.
“The government should not be hired thugs for construction firms, the law needs to be revised,” Chen added. “What is happening to the Wangs is not an isolated case. If we allow such a terrible law to exist without revision, any one of us could be its next victims.”
Activists also questioned the legality of the city government’s decision, because the Fire Services Act (消防法) stipulates that buildings over five stories tall can only be built on a street that is at least 4m in width to provide access to fire fighters, but the street in front of the planned construction site is less than 4m in width.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) said the Ministry of the Interior’s Construction and Planning Agency (CPA) has informed the Taipei City Government via an official letter that, according inspections of the area conducted by the agency, there could be genuine fire safety concerns regarding the -construction site because of the narrowness of the of streets surrounding it.
“The city government should not ignore the opinions of a central government agency,” she said, showing a copy of the letter.
However, a CPA official, who attended the press conference, said that the final say on the case belongs to the local government.
Taiwanese can file complaints with the Tourism Administration to report travel agencies if their activities caused termination of a person’s citizenship, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday, after a podcaster highlighted a case in which a person’s citizenship was canceled for receiving a single-use Chinese passport to enter Russia. The council is aware of incidents in which people who signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of Russia were told they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, Chiu told reporters on the sidelines of an event in Taipei. However, the travel agencies actually applied
Japanese footwear brand Onitsuka Tiger today issued a public apology and said it has suspended an employee amid allegations that the staff member discriminated against a Vietnamese customer at its Taipei 101 store. Posting on the social media platform Threads yesterday, a user said that an employee at the store said that “those shoes are very expensive” when her friend, who is a migrant worker from Vietnam, asked for assistance. The employee then ignored her until she asked again, to which she replied: "We don't have a size 37." The post had amassed nearly 26,000 likes and 916 comments as of this
New measures aimed at making Taiwan more attractive to foreign professionals came into effect this month, the National Development Council said yesterday. Among the changes, international students at Taiwanese universities would be able to work in Taiwan without a work permit in the two years after they graduate, explainer materials provided by the council said. In addition, foreign nationals who graduated from one of the world’s top 200 universities within the past five years can also apply for a two-year open work permit. Previously, those graduates would have needed to apply for a work permit using point-based criteria or have a Taiwanese company
The Shilin District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday indicted two Taiwanese and issued a wanted notice for Pete Liu (劉作虎), founder of Shenzhen-based smartphone manufacturer OnePlus Technology Co (萬普拉斯科技), for allegedly contravening the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) by poaching 70 engineers in Taiwan. Liu allegedly traveled to Taiwan at the end of 2014 and met with a Taiwanese man surnamed Lin (林) to discuss establishing a mobile software research and development (R&D) team in Taiwan, prosecutors said. Without approval from the government, Lin, following Liu’s instructions, recruited more than 70 software
RSS