A defendant in one of a number of death penalty cases said by human rights lawyers to be deeply flawed was sentenced to death for the eighth time yesterday, drawing anger from observers who say there is no forensic evidence to justify a conviction.
Hsu Tsu-chiang’s (徐自強) mother, Chen Hsiu-chin (陳秀琴), broke down when the judges at the Taiwan branch of the High Court read the judgment in the 14-year-old case, collapsing against a wall and sobbing uncontrollably.
The courtroom was packed to capacity as supporters, family and observers squeezed into the room and crowded the corridor outside to hear the judgment. Some wore T-shirts bearing the faces of the Hsichih Trio, another ongoing death penalty case that, like Hsu’s, was finalized by the Supreme Court — sending the defendants to death row — but later reopened because of flaws or new evidence.
PHOTO: YANG KUO-WEN, TAIPEI TIMES
After the judgment, Hsu’s mother had to be propped up as she walked out of the courthouse, and collapsed again on the steps outside, surrounded by reporters and photographers.
Dozens of human rights activists, lawyers and others gathered outside the courthouse, holding signs that read “injustice” as Chen cried on the pavement in front of them.
Hsu’s case had a significant impact on judicial procedure in 2004, when the Council of Grand Justices ruled that it was unconstitutional to use the confessions of his codefendants against him without allowing his lawyers to cross-examine them.
Constitutional Interpretation No. 582 applies to new cases, but because of limited resources, was applied retroactively in Hsu’s case alone, which was reopened in 2005. By that time, Hsu had spent five years on death row.
Hsu, 44, was one of three people convicted in the 1995 murder of Huang Chun-shu (黃春樹). Huang was kidnapped outside his home and murdered shortly afterward, his body disfigured and abandoned in the countryside in Taipei County.
Attempts by the murderers to secure a ransom from the family enabled police to track down two suspects. Those two remain on death row and were linked to the murder by forensic evidence.
Hsu, however, was convicted based solely on the confessions of the other two, his lawyers say. One of the two later said Hsu was innocent and that they had implicated him because they wanted revenge over a private conflict.
The Control Yuan in 2001 issued a scathing report on Hsu’s conviction, citing serious flaws in the case, while the prosecutor-general filed a record five extraordinary appeals in the case, seeking to reopen it.
The Supreme Court agreed only after the Council of Grand Justices’ ruling.
Prosecutors say the evidence against Hsu is solid, citing the fact that one of the suspects (who left the country and was never caught) stayed at Hsu’s home around the time of the crime and that a car rented by him was one of several cars used for the crime.
Defense lawyers dismiss these arguments as circumstantial and add that all the other cars used for the crime were stolen, and it was therefore extremely doubtful that the perpetrators would have been careless enough to rent one of the cars under one of their own names. Hsu was tricked into renting a car for his “friends,” who didn’t have one and said they needed it for the day, his lawyers say.
The Control Yuan agreed that prosecutors’ arguments were “illogical.” It also said prosecutors ignored testimony indicating that Hsu was not at the scene of the crime.
Before the judgment was announced, as Chen waited in the hallway for guards to arrive with her son from Taipei Detention Center, she said Hsu no longer believed he would ever be free.
“They only have the confessions to go on,” she told the Taipei Times. “How can that be justice?”
“He wants to give up. He told me long ago: ‘This case is hurting everyone so much, let me go mother [let the execution proceed],’” she said.
After the judgment, between sobs, Chen said she had prepared lunch and new clothes for her son, hoping he would finally come home with her, but the clothes will go unworn.
In an interview the day before the latest judgment, Hsu’s lawyer Greg Yo (尤伯祥) said there is no evidence that Hsu participated in the 1995 murder.
On the other hand, “there is plenty of evidence that the two codefendants lied when they implicated Hsu,” he said.
The case will now go to the Supreme Court, which is likely to return the case to the lower court for a retrial.
NATIONAL SECURITY: Authorities are working to confirm the identities of the military personnel involved and investigating possible illegal conduct and regulatory violations Authorities are probing possible national security implications after Kinmen police and immigration officers on Sunday found a Chinese woman allegedly posing as a tourist while engaging in prostitution involving more than 10 military personnel. The woman, surnamed Chen (陳), has since been deported, authorities said, adding that investigators are still working to confirm the identities of those implicated, as the records only listed code names and aliases. The case stemmed from a report received by the Kinmen District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday last week from the Jinhu Precinct of the Kinmen County Police Bureau. On Sunday, police, along with the National Immigration
GLOBALGIVING: ‘ Caving to external pressure is not acceptable for an organization that has cultivated justice reform and human rights for 30 years,’ one NGO said A slew of non-government organizations (NGOs) have withdrawn from the GlobalGiving fundraising platform after it announced it would use “Chinese Taipei” instead of “Taiwan” from next month. The Taiwan Good Rice Association wrote on Facebook on Friday that it was informed on April 28 via a teleconference call of the change, which was made because the platform wanted to operate in China. Taiwan Good Rice is to terminate all cooperative relationships with GlobalGiving in response to the platform’s “unilateral and non-negotiable” decision to remove references to Taiwan, the NGO said. “Taiwan is in the official name of Taiwan Good Rice Association and the
HEAVY WEATHER: Typhoon Jangmi is due to crash straight into the Ryukyus as airlines look to shift flights to larger aircraft or cancel flights to Okinawa entirely Taiwan’s international air carriers announced flight adjustments over the weekend as Typhoon Jangmi is forecast to hit the Ryukyu Islands today and tomorrow. The Central Weather Administration (CWA) upgraded Jangmi from a tropical storm to a typhoon at 8am yesterday, with the eye located 580km south of Naha city. It was moving north at 19kph. Today, China Airlines’ CI-120, CI-121, CI-122 and CI-123 flights between Taoyuan and Naha, Okinawa, have been canceled as well as CI-132 and CI-133 between Kaohsiung and Naha. EVA Air’s BR-112, BR-113, BR-186 and BR-185 flights between Taoyuan and Naha are also canceled. Low-cost carrier Tigerair Taiwan canceled IT-230,
MULTIPRONGED APPROACH: China has sought to pressure Palau across a number of fronts, but the island nation has staunchly resisted overtures to ditch Taiwan Palau has been firm in backing Taiwan despite Chinese pressure that uses tourism economics, cyberattacks and criminal infiltration as tools to threaten the Pacific ally into renouncing its recognition of Taiwan as a sovereign state. The Presidential Office yesterday announced that Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) would visit Palau from Saturday to Wednesday next week at the invitation of Palauan President Surangel Whipps Jr. Whipps in April said in an interview that China had outspokenly asked Palau to “denounce Taiwan.” “And we have said: ‘We have no enemies, but nobody tells us who our friends are,’” he said. Whipps has told reporters multiple times
RSS