Handing out flyers, parading and staging sit-ins, supporters and opponents of Penghu County’s casino plan put in a last-minute effort to mobilize support for their cause yesterday on the eve of today’s casino referendum.
On Thursday, anti-casino activists launched a 30-hour sit-in against casinos in Magong City (馬公), the seat of the archipelago county’s government, urging people to vote “no,” while the Penghu Chamber of Commerce, a prominent group promoting casino resorts in Penghu, organized a parade with 200 vehicles through the three major islands of the county, calling on the public to vote “yes.”
From village to village, at the airport, and in front of temples, casino supporters and opponents distributed flyers promoting their ideas to passersby.
“Tourism is the main industry in Penghu, but its development is restrained due to strong winds in fall and winter,” Chamber of Commerce president Lan Chun-yi (藍俊逸) said. “Casino resorts are another chance for prosperity for Penghu, that’s why I’m urging everyone to vote for the casino plan.”
But anti-casino activists were worried that casinos would bring criminal activities and the destruction of the local ecology.
“Only a very few people, politicians and big corporations would benefit,” said Ho Tsung-hsun (何宗勳), spokesman for the Alliance Against Legalization of Gambling, adding that with only two casino permits planned, it was hard to envision massive prosperity for Penghu.
An amendment to the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) passed by the legislature in January allows outlying islands to construct casino resorts if a majority of residents support casinos in a referendum.
Meanwhile, Penghu’s Non-Partisan Solidarity Union Legislator Lin Ping-kun (林炳坤) accused anti-casino activists of “twisting facts” about casinos and accused outsiders of opposing casinos.
“I’ve never heard my constituents oppose the casino plan,” Lin said in a press conference. “However, some people from Taiwan proper have recently been using the Democratic Progressive Party’s [DPP] resources to launch an anti-casino campaign.”
“I would like to ask those anti-casino activists if they’ve lived in Penghu. If they had, they would understand the suffering of the Penghu residents,” he said.
However, Penghu Alliance Against Casinos executive director Yen Chiang-lung (顏江龍), a Penghu native, rebutted Lin’s accusations.
“All the members of my organization are Penghu natives — we’re at the core of this anti-casino campaign,” he told the Taipei Times. “There are also anti-casino groups in Taiwan proper. We welcome their support as friends, but we’re separate groups.”
Yen said it was ridiculous to accuse them of campaigning with DPP resources.
“Yes, DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen [蔡英文] announced her support for our campaign, and we welcome it, but how can you say we’re in cahoots with the DPP because of that?” he asked, adding that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) and Lai Shyh-pao (賴士葆) did not vote for amending the casino clause, while Control Yuan president Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) and presidential advisor Lee Chia-tung (李家同) had also spoken out against casinos.
“Would you say that we also used resources from the KMT and the government for our campaign?” Yen asked.
Meanwhile, nearly 20 people from the Anti-Gambling Legislation Alliance, a group composed of several civil groups, yesterday filed a petition with the Penghu District Prosecutors Office calling on prosecutors to launch an investigation into vote-buying allegations.
“There have been rumors floating around that supporters of casinos will give each borough chief NT$300,000 and ward chiefs NT$50,000 if they mobilize voters, and the price of each vote was said to be NT$2,000,” Ho Tsung-hsun said.
The alliance also said it suspected the involvement of gangs in the referendum.
Ho said the police had reminded members of the anti-gambling alliance to be careful during the run-up to the referendum to avoid incidents because the police had learned that local people were unhappy about outsiders being involved in the anti-gambling campaign.
The government should improve children’s outdoor spaces and accelerate carbon reduction programs, as the risk of heat-related injury due to high summer temperatures rises each year, Greenpeace told a news conference yesterday. Greenpeace examined summer temperatures in Taipei, New Taipei City, Taoyuan, Hsinchu City, Taichung, Tainan and Kaohsiung to determine the effects of high temperatures and climate change on children’s outdoor activities, citing data garnered by China Medical University, which defines a wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) of 29°C or higher as posing the risk of heat-related injury. According to the Central Weather Administration, WBGT, commonly referred to as the heat index, estimates
Taipei and other northern cities are to host air-raid drills from 1:30pm to 2pm tomorrow as part of urban resilience drills held alongside the Han Kuang exercises, Taiwan’s largest annual military exercises. Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung, Taoyuan, Yilan County, Hsinchu City and Hsinchu County are to hold the annual Wanan air defense exercise tomorrow, following similar drills held in central and southern Taiwan yesterday and today respectively. The Taipei Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) and Maokong Gondola are to run as usual, although stations and passenger parking lots would have an “entry only, no exit” policy once air raid sirens sound, Taipei
Taipei placed 14th in the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) Best Student Cities 2026 list, its highest ever, according to results released yesterday. With an overall score of 89.1, the city climbed 12 places from the previous year, surpassing its previous best ranking of 17th in 2019. Taipei is “one of Asia’s leading higher-education hubs,” with strong employer activity scores and students “enjoying their experience of the city and often keen to stay after graduation,” a QS staff writer said. In addition to Taipei, Hsinchu (71st), Tainan (92nd), Taichung (113th) and Taoyuan (130th) also made QS’ list of the top 150 student cities. Hsinchu showed the
Environmental groups yesterday filed an appeal with the Executive Yuan, seeking to revoke the environmental impact assessment (EIA) conditionally approved in February for the Hsieh-ho Power Plant’s planned fourth liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving station off the coast of Keelung. The appeal was filed jointly by the Protect Waimushan Seashore Action Group, the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association and the Keelung City Taiwan Head Cultural Association, which together held a news conference outside the Executive Yuan in Taipei. Explaining the reasons for the appeal, Wang Hsing-chih (王醒之) of the Protect Waimushan Seashore Action Group said that the EIA failed to address
RSS