Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) yesterday appealed to the court to release him from custody so that he could defend himself at the appeals court.
Chen has been in custody since December. He and his wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), were sentenced to life in prison for graft on Friday, making them the first former first family in the nation's history to be indicted and convicted.
Chen has asked his lawyers to file an appeal, but said he would not attend the hearings if his appeals were not handled in a fair and transparent manner.
Chen said in a 10-point statement released by his office yesterday that he could challenge President Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) re-election bid in 2012, like Ma did when he announced his presidential bid right after he was indicted for graft
“But I will not do that,” Chen said in the statement.
“When I saw the ruling against me, I know I stand a chance of proving my innocence,” Chen said.
“I don't believe that all High Court judges are like the presiding judge in my case, Tsai Shou-hsun (蔡守訓),” he said.
Chen asked the court to release him, claiming that Special Investigation Panel (SIP) prosecutors Lin Jhe-huei and Yueh Fang-ju (越方如) had said his incarceration could end after all the witnesses or defendants were questioned.
He would not escape, Chen said, because as a former president, he would have a heavy security detail. His public attorney also had his new passport and he was willing to give it to the court or Ministry of Foreign Affairs for safekeeping.
“Please let me have my freedom back, so I can enjoy the least that a defendant is entitled to: a chance for a fair trial,” he said.
Calling the ruling illegal and unconstitutional, the statement said the court processed the cases with political bias.
“Just like what [New York-based political commentator] Cao Changqing (曹長青) said in his recent column, in which he asked what Chen Shui-bian's ‘crimes’ are: ‘His crime is promoting Taiwan independence. His crime is declaring ‘one country on either side of the Taiwan Strait.’ His crime is insisting on holding a referendum on joining the UN under the name ‘Taiwan,’” the statement read.
Instead of reaching a verdict based on evidence, the statement said it was a “100 percent ethical judgment” and Tsai rejected all accounts concerning the presidential funds made by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), former Presidential Office chief account Fon Shui-lin (馮瑞麟) and former chief of the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics Hsu Chang-yao (許璋瑤).
The statement said that while the former president knew nothing about the cash donation by former Taipei Financial Center Corp chairwoman Diana Chen (陳敏薰), the court ruled it was an act of bribery and profiteering.
The statement also criticized Tsai for applying double standards to the former president's discretionary fund and Ma's “special allowance fund” during his stint as Taipei mayor.
Chen’s office yesterday also requested that the Taiwan High Court publicize the travel records of Judge Chen Hsiao-pei (陳筱珮) to prove that Taiwan High Court President Huang Shui-tong (黃水通) did not interfere in the former president's cases.
Citing an anonymous source at the High Court, Chen's office on Monday issued a statement alleging that after Judge Chou Chan-chun (周占春) released Chen from detention last year, Huang called up and asked Judge Chen Hsiao-pei, who was abroad at the time, whether Chou should be removed from the former president’s cases.
Chen Hsiao-pei later served as the one of the panel of judges who reviewed an SIP appeal against Chou’s decision to release Chen Shui-bian from detention. The panel ruled to keep Chen Shui-bian in detention.
Huang dismissed the allegations, while Taiwan High Court spokesperson Wen Yao-yuan (溫耀源) said Chen Hsiao-pei had been selected from a random drawing, in accordance with the law.
As for which high court judge would preside over Chen Shui-bian's appeal, Wen said the High Court would conduct a random draw in accordance with the law and that the entire process would be transparent.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS