Thu, Aug 06, 2009 - Page 3 News List

Teachers urge Taipei City to drop textbook rules

TEXTBOOK BROUHAHAThe Taipei Teachers' Association urged the Taipei City Government to accept Friday's conclusive ruling by the Council of Grand Justices

By Flora Wang and Loa Iok-sin  /  STAFF REPORTERS

The Taipei Teachers’ Association (TTA) yesterday urged the Taipei City Government to drop its insistence on controlling which textbooks are used in the city’s primary and junior high schools.

In a press release, the TTA called on the city government to accept a ruling by the Council of Grand Justices on Friday last week that schools be permitted to choose their own textbooks as long as the textbooks follow the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) curriculum guidelines.

“Section 2 of Article 2 of the National Education Act (國民教育法) allows a school to choose different versions of textbooks based on the characteristics of that school’s community and the needs of its students,” the TTA said.

There remain great discrepancies between schools in the city, the TTA said, adding that forcing every school in the city to adopt the same textbooks runs counter to the spirit of the National Education Act.

The TTA’s call came after Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) on Monday said that Taipei City, Taipei County and Keelung would continue to pursue a “one curriculum guideline, one textbook” policy, despite the council’s rejection of an appeal by the city government.

The appeal filed on May 3, 2007, by the Taipei City Government and seven other county and city governments governed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) asked the Grand Justices for a constitutional interpretation of the National Education Act and the ministry’s policy that local governments cannot decide what textbooks a school should use.

The ministry allows schools to choose different versions of textbooks, as long as the books follow the ministry’s curriculum guidelines.

Up until the 2002 school year, the ministry required students nationwide to use textbooks published by the National Institute For Compilation and Translation. The change was aimed at ensuring a diversity of perspectives in textbooks.

The eight local governments said, however, that it was unreasonable for the ministry not to allow them to have the final say over which textbooks were to be used in their jurisdictions. The governments claimed they had the authority to choose one textbook for each subject.

The TTA said that a survey carried out by the TTA and the National Teachers Association last year showed that the number of students attending cram schools had surged after Taipei City’s Department of Education required that all schools in the city used the same textbook for each subject.

“The ministry has said it would cut Taipei City’s educational funding should it stick to its policy. This would seriously affect the rights of students in Taipei,” the TTA said.

Also yesterday, the Humanistic Education Foundation (HEF) said that it had always objected to Taipei’s textbook policy.

“The Council of Grand Justices have made the interpretation that it’s up to central government — not the local government — to interpret the National Education Act, so Taipei City Government should follow the ministry’s policy, not invent its own,” HEF executive director Joanna Feng (馮喬蘭) told the Taipei Times during a phone interview.

Feng condemned Taipei City for trying to alter the textbook selection process.

“Although the city government would ask schools to choose textbooks, choices made by the schools have to be submitted to the city government for approval,” she said. “So in the end, it’s still a few people who make the decision — this is in violation of the spirit of the National Education Act and disrespects the professionalism of teachers.”

This story has been viewed 3086 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top