The Ministry of Education (MOE) yesterday rebutted media speculation that it would create openings for military instructors in junior high and elementary schools.
In a press release, the ministry said it would never provide openings for the ministry’s military instructors in junior high and primary schools.
The ministry was only planning to have military instructors from senior high and vocational high schools offer assistance to elementary and junior high schools that did not have sufficient teaching staff to promote national defense education among students, the MOE said.
The military instructors would not interfere in any student affairs or student counseling in primary and junior high schools, the MOE said.
The ministry would begin to review the number of military instructors on campus in the next academic year, the MOE said.
The presence of military instructors at high schools and universities dates back to the 1950s, when they were responsible for students’ military training, discipline and political education.
They are now generally tasked with ensuring campus safety. Those at high schools are also responsible for student discipline, counseling and military training courses.
The ministry has sought to reduce the number of military instructors at universities since the term of former education minister Tu Cheng-sheng (杜正勝), who considered their presence on campuses inappropriate.
The ministry drew criticism after it released a proposal titled Improvement and Adjustment of the Work of Military Instructors on Feb. 11.
The proposal suggested that the ministry include “national defense education” in the curriculum guidelines of elementary and junior high schools and have military instructors from senior and vocational high schools provide assistance to nearby junior high and elementary schools.
This measure should be taken because the National Defense Education Act (全民國防教育法) stipulates that schools across the nation should promote national defense education, the proposal said.
When asked for comment, KMT Legislator Shuai Hua-ming (帥化民), a member of the legislature’s Foreign and National Defense Committee, supported the idea of having military instructors teach pupils about national defense as long as the instructors would not interfere in student affairs.
However, Humanistic Education Foundation chief executive officer Joanna Feng (馮喬蘭) lashed out at the ministry over the plan.
“We should not allow the instructors to teach on campus just because we are trying to resolve [the issue of] the openings for instructors. We are sacrificing children’s rights to education. This should never be done,” Feng said.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) said military instructors should not only leave colleges, they should also leave senior high schools.
It is ridiculous that the MOE wants to arrange military instructors to teach in junior high schools and elementary schools, she said.
DPP Spokesman Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) said that there was a social consensus to withdraw military instructors from schools and adding more military instructors into schools was a step backward.
Children need counselors in schools, not military instructors, he said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY RICH CHANG
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods