The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus will decide today whether to smooth the way for four cross-strait agreements in legislative committee reviews this week, KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said yesterday. It was unclear whether a deadline would be met to put them to a legislative vote.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have accused the KMT of stalling reviews of the agreements — which were signed by the Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait last month — to avoid putting them to a legislative vote, which would lead to their enactment by default.
The KMT caucus was scheduled to meet this morning to decide whether to require legislators to attend the committee reviews of the pacts, which concern direct sea links, daily charter flights and postal services, along with food safety.
In a telephone interview, Lo said the caucus would help the government push through the agreements.
The Dec. 13 deadline for a vote should be met, Lo said.
But despite Lo’s statement, this seemed very unlikely.
The agreements are scheduled to be reviewed at joint meetings of the Internal Administration Committee, the Transportation Committee, the Foreign and National Defense Committee and the Health, Environment and Labor Committee on Wednesday and Thursday.
They were first submitted to the legislature on Nov. 13. On Nov. 21, the KMT sent the agreements to the committees for review.
Article 95 of the Statute Governing the Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) stipulates that the legislature must accept or reject any agreement on cross-strait trade or direct transportation links within one month of receiving it from the government. However, any agreement becomes effective automatically if the legislature does not sanction it before that deadline.
Even if the committees complete the reviews this week, the agreements must then go to the Procedure Committee, which meets on Dec. 9, to be put on the plenary agenda for Dec. 12.
The legislature may not get to vote on the four agreements at the plenary session given the number of bills pending legislative review.
In addition, if enough KMT legislators choose not attend the reviews this week, the committees will not be able to carry out the reviews.
DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said yesterday that the DPP caucus would not accept stalling the reviews because it would mean passing the agreements by default.
The DPP caucus has said that Taiwan stands to gain very little through the agreements, while putting its interests at risk.
To prevent an “autocratic” government, Ker said the DPP caucus had proposed a bill in October that would require any cross-strait agreements concerning “critical national interests” to be decided by Taiwanese voters in a referendum.
Under the bill, the Executive Yuan would be required to submit a draft of any agreement with China to the legislature before signing it.
The draft would then need to be negotiated and passed by the appropriate legislative committees before being put to a popular vote.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all