Taipei Times: Some people have accused the administration of being “naive” in believing that Beijing will exercise goodwill toward Taiwan based on the so-called “diplomatic truce.” What’s your response? Also, can you define just exactly what a “diplomatic truce” is?
Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊): In fact, a “diplomatic truce” was a concept that I proposed many years ago. For a long time, Taiwan’s diplomacy focused on maintaining relations with our existing allies and fostering warmer ties with important non-allies such as the US, Japan and the EU. However, we have consistently ignored China, refusing to enter into a dialog with Beijing. We cannot keep blindfolding ourselves by pretending China does not exist.
PHOTO: CHU PEI-HSIUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
The world trend now is to replace conflict with reconciliation. You will only reap more trouble if you insist on antagonizing [Beijing].
To reach cross-strait reconciliation, the most significant layer would of course be on the diplomatic front. Cross-strait harmony would be impossible unless both sides can reconcile over diplomatic issues.
Yes, many people have said that it seems like Taiwan is retreating and that Taiwan is “begging” China, but that is absolutely incorrect.
To say Taiwan is “begging” China would be to say that Taiwan has a case of “unrequited love” (一廂情願) hoping Beijing would extend its goodwill, which is not at all the case.
A diplomatic truce can only take place when both sides offer goodwill. I think a truce in the Strait is highly possible because a continuing antagonism would be damaging to them and to us.
Truth be told, many underhanded tactics are used in the diplomatic scuffle. It is not only a monumental waste of money, but also creates animosity from the international community about creating instability in a certain region. For example, Australia has been publicly offended about the China-Taiwan tug-of-war in the South Pacific.
On the contrary, positive cross-strait interaction would erase the negative images of both countries and create a win-win situation for both sides. Therefore we should avoid any factors that might discourage a positive interaction. A diplomatic conflict should be the first obstacle removed from preventing improved cross-strait relations.
Also, many Chinese leaders have stressed that to resolve the Taiwan Strait issue, [Beijing] must first win the hearts of the Taiwanese people. Thus a conflict with Taiwan would not serve its national interests.
On Taiwan’s participation in international organizations: In an era of globalization, world-wide collaboration has become more crucial than ever.
Taiwan’s long-standing alienation not only infringes on our rights, the world also suffers from not benefiting from what Taiwan can contribute. Therefore, to the international community, Taiwan’s participation is absolutely necessary.
China’s oppression is the only reason why Taiwan is alienated. In recent years, we have gained more sympathy and support from other nations, such as in the case of the WHO. We need to be pragmatic and recognize the crux of the issue.
No matter whether you approach it from a pragmatic or a flexible perspective, Taiwan must engage China to solve the dilemma. So it is evident that whether it’s bilateral relations or multilateral relations, Taiwan needs to have a dialog with Beijing.
TT: From the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ perspective, what kind of goodwill has China extended toward Taiwan since May 20?
Ou: At the moment, all cross-strait discussions have been focused on economic issues. We have a tacit understanding with Beijing that the harder issues, meaning political issues, will come later.
It is quite clear that the Beijing government has heard Taiwan’s concerns. [Chinese President] Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) on several occasions said the issue of Taiwan’s international space can be discussed. We can say that is the direction that China is heading.
Since we have not launched an official discussion, we can now only try to interpret their intentions which are still unclear to us because sometimes their officials are courteous at international settings, but sometimes not.
I think it is because China has not made an internal decision on its future attitude toward Taiwan, but they are very clear over Taiwan’s intentions. However, I am quite sure they also favor the direction of reconciliation.
TT: What would Taiwan consider as examples of China’s goodwill?
Ou: Paraguay is a good example of China’s goodwill. During the election, the Paraguayan president-elect said he would sever relations with Taiwan once he won the seat. But so far we have not heard any more about it. Moreover, he has invited us to attend his presidential inauguration.
So far we can say it is all stable, but it does not mean we can relax because, who knows, maybe one day Paraguay will go back on its word.
Our diplomatic strategy in the future will not be too different from the past, except that in the past we concentrated too much on gaining new friends but ignored our existing allies. And this is why we lost nine allies but only gained three in the last eight years.
Now we will focus our energy on cementing ties with our allies. As part of Taiwan’s goodwill toward China, we will also not approach its allies.
TT: Critics have said that Beijing is becoming the one dictating Taiwan’s diplomatic affairs and that Taiwan is retreating.
Ou: Absolutely not. Taiwan is definitely not retreating, but concentrating on strengthening ties with our existing allies. We want to maintain the current status where Taiwan will not try to lure away Beijing’s allies and Beijing agrees to leave our friends alone.
But if Beijing refuses to call a truce, then we will have no choice but to return to the previous ugly fighting, which would be a huge disservice to both sides, as has been proven in the past.
TT: Is there a concern that some of Taiwan’s allies might become more interested in establishing ties with Beijing since Taiwan itself has also become more China-friendly?
Ou: It is a fact that many countries want to lean toward China, but there are also countries that are leaning toward Taiwan. That is the ugliness of a diplomatic scuffle. Therefore to avoid such contention, both sides must uphold goodwill by not moving away from the current status.
To me it would be heartbreaking to see the ugliness continue, because it would just be a waste of the taxpayer’s money.
TT: President Ma has repeatedly stressed the importance of repairing mutual trust between Taipei and Washington. In your view, how badly was the relationship damaged and how does Taiwan propose to fix it?
Ou: Because of what happened in the past, the US is still skeptical about whether the new administration is trustworthy or not. US-Taiwan relations deteriorated to the level that there were doubts about Taiwan’s credibility and whether it would honor or default on its promises.
In the future, we will consult with the US on major policies to ensure a “surprise-free” relationship that the president has strongly stressed.
This is the main reason why we have emphasized that the president’s stopovers in the US will simply be transits on the way to our destinations. No fanfares and no activities, as promised.
A magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck off the coast of Yilan County at 8:39pm tonight, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said, with no immediate reports of damage or injuries. The epicenter was 38.7km east-northeast of Yilan County Hall at a focal depth of 98.3km, the CWA’s Seismological Center said. The quake’s maximum intensity, which gauges the actual physical effect of a seismic event, was a level 4 on Taiwan’s 7-tier intensity scale, the center said. That intensity level was recorded in Yilan County’s Nanao Township (南澳), Hsinchu County’s Guansi Township (關西), Nantou County’s Hehuanshan (合歡山) and Hualien County’s Yanliao (鹽寮). An intensity of 3 was
Instead of focusing solely on the threat of a full-scale military invasion, the US and its allies must prepare for a potential Chinese “quarantine” of Taiwan enforced through customs inspections, Stanford University Hoover fellow Eyck Freymann said in a Foreign Affairs article published on Wednesday. China could use various “gray zone” tactics in “reconfiguring the regional and ultimately the global economic order without a war,” said Freymann, who is also a nonresident research fellow at the US Naval War College. China might seize control of Taiwan’s links to the outside world by requiring all flights and ships entering or leaving Taiwan
The first of 10 new high-capacity trains purchased from South Korea’s Hyundai Rotem arrived at the Port of Taipei yesterday to meet the demands of an expanding metro network, Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) said yesterday. The train completed a three-day, 1,200km voyage from the Port of Masan in South Korea, the company said. Costing NT$590 million (US$18.79 million) each, the new six-carriage trains feature a redesigned interior based on "human-centric" transportation concepts, TRTC said. The design utilizes continuous longitudinal seating to widen the aisles and optimize passenger flow, while also upgrading passenger information displays and driving control systems for a more comfortable
Taiwan's first indigenous defense submarine, the SS-711 Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), departed for its 13th sea trial at 7am today, marking its seventh submerged test, with delivery to the navy scheduled for July. The outing also marked its first sea deployment since President William Lai (賴清德) boarded the submarine for an inspection on March 19, drawing a crowd of military enthusiasts who gathered to show support. The submarine this morning departed port accompanied by CSBC Corp’s Endeavor Manta (奮進魔鬼魚號) uncrewed surface vessel and a navy M109 assault boat. Amid public interest in key milestones such as torpedo-launching operations and overnight submerged trials,