Taiwan is well known as a manufacturer of high-tech goods, and Taipei 101 has become an internationally recognized symbol of the nation’s economic achievements. But Taiwan has also achieved a benchmark of social progress that is lesser known, but equally impressive: It has the highest recycling rate in the world.
The fact that Taiwan recycles an average of 32.22 percent of all waste may seem unimpressive, but according to Lin Chien-huei (林建輝), the director of the Environmental Protection Administration’s Recycling Fund Management Board, the figure is remarkable when compared with other countries.
“According to the latest research in the field, only about 40 percent of all waste is recyclable, so Taiwan is actually recycling more than 80 percent of all recyclable waste,” Lin told the Taipei Times on Thursday.
Since 1998, the management board has masterminded Taiwan’s recycling strategy, Lin said, adding that in the past few years, because the price of raw materials has been on the rise, recycled materials have also increased in demand and price.
“There is virtually nothing in the world that cannot be recycled. The question is whether the materials are worth reusing, in terms of cost-effectiveness,” he said.
The board identifies some 30 types of waste as recyclable, including various metals, glass, some types of plastic, paper, and some home appliances and electronics, Lin said. He added that with regard to recycling these materials, Taiwan has achieved some notable levels.
“For example,” said Lin, “While the EU has set a goal of recycling 25 percent of all discarded batteries by 2015, we have averaged more than 30 percent in the past few years. Last year, we even broke the 40 percent mark.”
In addition to batteries, the nation’s recycling rates for containers are quite high — such as the rate for PEP plastic drink bottles, which he said is 100 percent.
Several reasons contribute to Taiwan’s success in recycling: a solid policy platform, a transparent price schedule for reusable materials and a convenient recycling process, Lin said.
The board runs the recycling process quite well now, he said, but “the mechanism was the result of a few years of trial and error.”
In 1997, when the government announced that a recycling fee would be collected from all manufacturers, businesses formed private unions to manage the collection of these fees, Lin said.
“But because Taiwan’s economic structure is one with many small and medium-sized enterprises, the scale of management needed soon snowballed, and it became difficult for unions to handle. It became clear that the government needed to step in and form an agency that was solely dedicated to that purpose,” he said.
Because the board was a government agency, it was able to provide a fair trade mechanism that was tailored to Taiwan’s needs, he added.
Lin said that the next step, after having a central organization intact, was a guided transaction process between manufacturers of waste and recyclers.
“Taiwan employs a ‘cradle to grave’ policy in terms of designating responsibility ownership for recycling work — meaning that manufacturers of, say, soft drinks are responsible for the fees incurred for collecting and recycling their products’ empty cans,” he said.
When the government announced the recycling fee, it also established a fee schedule for all manufacturers with products that generate waste, based on the amount of waste their products create, Lin said.
RSS