The Taiwan Coalition Against Violence (TCAV) lauded the significant steps made in the country’s campaign to end domestic violence since the Domestic Violence Law (家暴法) was adopted 10 years ago, but said more measures, including to protect victims, were still desperately needed.
“The most important achievement [in the campaign against domestic violence] is that government authorities are now more active in helping victims. Ten years ago victims were pretty much on their own,” Gau Fehng-shian (高鳳仙), TCAV chairwoman and a Taiwan High Court judge, told a forum in Taipei yesterday.
The coalition said that domestic violence includes any violence within a family, not only violence against women and children.
PHOTO: FANG PIN-CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
The passage of the law a decade ago was a significant step, since domestic violence has traditionally been considered a family problem that the public should not interfere in, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Yang Chiung-ying (楊瓊纓) said.
Yet despite the progress over the past decade, the forum participants all agreed that crucial improvements to the handling of abuse cases, particularly in regards to the protection offered to victims of domestic violence, were still sorely needed.
Administrative efficiency must also be improved, they said.
“It can sometimes take up to 40 days before a judge issues a protection order on behalf of a victim of domestic violence,” Gau said. “As for emergency protection orders, the law states that they should be issued within four hours of a victim filing an application, yet it usually takes one, two or sometimes even three days.”
“I wonder how effective a protection order is after that many days,” Gau said.
TCAV vice chairwoman Chou Ching-yu (周清玉) said authorities still lacked adequate manpower to deal with this serious issue.
“In the first year after the Domestic Violence Law was adopted, more than 10,000 cases of domestic violence were reported. And last year, the number grew to more than 70,000,” Chou said. “Yet the number of social workers [available] to look after the cases hasn’t changed much.”
TCAV board member Lai Mei-hui (賴美惠) attributed the lack of manpower and other resources to underfunding and said the government should set up a domestic violence victim assistance fund.
“I suggest that the government create a fund with a total of NT$3 billion [US$98.7 million] over the next 10 years to assist victims of domestic violence,” she said. “The money could come from fines for domestic violence and sexual harassment cases, as well as bail money for such cases.”
Deputy Minister of the Interior Lai Fong-wei (賴峰偉), who attended the forum, promised to communicate all the suggestions and comments to the ministry for consideration.
He said the government should consider reforms to attract more social workers to handle domestic violence cases.
“At the moment, these social workers are contractors — not public servants — and thus are offered lower wages and excluded from promotions and other government benefits,” he said. “I’ll push for a reform to include contractor social workers into the government’s promotion and benefit system so that we may attract more such people.”
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods