US nationals do not automatically lose their citizenship when they serve in a foreign government, an official from the US State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs said.
Any nationals intending to relinquish their US citizenship must complete all formalities, which include signing an oath of renunciation before a US diplomatic or consular officer at a US embassy or consulate, the official said.
“Renunciations that do not meet the conditions described above have no legal effect,” the official told the Central News Agency.
The issue has drawn much attention since it was reported recently that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Diane Lee (李慶安) had never officially renounced her US citizenship although she has been in public office in Taiwan since 1994.
Lee admitted that she obtained US citizenship in 1991, but argued that she lost her status as a US citizen “legally” when she was sworn in as a Taipei city councilor in 1994.
However, the US official said that while serving in a foreign government is one of the legal conditions for loss of citizenship, the US Immigration and Nationality Act also states that such an act must be performed “voluntarily and with intent to relinquish US citizenship.”
Therefore, the formalities mentioned above must be completed, he said.
Under pressure from the Democratic Progressive Party, the legislature adopted a resolution on Friday asking the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to help verify with foreign governments whether any of the sitting legislators hold foreign citizenship.
The move was made in line with Taiwan’s Nationality Act (國籍法), which forbids Republic of China nationals who hold foreign citizenship from assuming public office and requires those with foreign citizenship be removed from their posts.
The American Institute in Taiwan did not respond to a Taipei Times’ e-mail inquiry yesterday on whether a US national could lose his or her citizenship without the formal act of relinquishing it before a US immigration officer.
The Bureau of Consular Affairs’ Web site states that there is no general prohibition on US citizens running for an elected office in a foreign government. However, the eighth clause under Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states that US federal government officers may not accept foreign government employment without the consent of Congress.
With respect to loss of nationality, 349(a)(4) of the US’ Immigration and Nationality Act states that accepting, serving in, or performing duties in a foreign government is potentially an expatriating act if the person is a national of that country or takes an oath of allegiance in connection with the position.
“The threshold question,” the bureau’s Web site said, “is whether the person’s actions fall within the scope of this provision.”
“The prefatory language of Section 349 requires that the expatriating act be performed voluntarily “with the intention of relinquishing US nationality. Thus, if it is determined that the person’s action falls within the purview of 349(a)(4), an adjudication of the person’s intent must be made,” it said.
Given that “the State Department’s administrative practice presumes that US citizens employed in non-policy level positions in a foreign government do not have the requisite intent to relinquish US citizenship, there are no efforts to see out or adjudicate the citizenship of nationals who fall into this category of employment.”
“Efforts also must be made to fully adjudicate such cases to determine one’s intent if the individual serves in a policy-level position in a foreign government. Service in a country’s legislative body is considered by the State Department to be a policy-level position.”
In a situation where holding a foreign office may be incompatible with maintaining US citizenship, each case would be examined on a case-by-case basis.
Kevin Stratford, an immigration lawyer in the US, said that because relinquishing one’s US citizenship is irrevocable, the US government advises individuals to take careful consideration before relinquishing their citizenship.
Even in the case of treason, the court has to thoroughly examine how the person’s action has harmed the interests of the US government before stripping the individual’s citizenship, he said.
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union yesterday vowed to protest at the EVA Air Marathon on Sunday next week should EVA Airway Corp’s management continue to ignore the union’s petition to change rules on employees’ leave of absence system, after a flight attendant reportedly died after working on a long-haul flight while ill. The case has generated public discussion over whether taking personal or sick leave should affect a worker’s performance review. Several union members yesterday protested at the Legislative Yuan, holding white flowers and placards, while shouting: “Life is priceless; requesting leave is not a crime.” “The union is scheduled to meet with
‘UNITED FRONT’ RHETORIC: China’s TAO also plans to hold weekly, instead of biweekly, news conferences because it wants to control the cross-strait discourse, an expert said China’s plan to expand its single-entry visa-on-arrival service to Taiwanese would be of limited interest to Taiwanese and is a feeble attempt by Chinese administrators to demonstrate that they are doing something, the Mainland Affairs Council said yesterday. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) said the program aims to facilitate travel to China for Taiwanese compatriots, regardless of whether they are arriving via direct flights or are entering mainland China through Hong Kong, Macau or other countries, and they would be able to apply for a single-entry visa-on-arrival at all eligible entry points in China. The policy aims
RSS