US nationals do not automatically lose their citizenship when they serve in a foreign government, an official from the US State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs said.
Any nationals intending to relinquish their US citizenship must complete all formalities, which include signing an oath of renunciation before a US diplomatic or consular officer at a US embassy or consulate, the official said.
“Renunciations that do not meet the conditions described above have no legal effect,” the official told the Central News Agency.
The issue has drawn much attention since it was reported recently that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Diane Lee (李慶安) had never officially renounced her US citizenship although she has been in public office in Taiwan since 1994.
Lee admitted that she obtained US citizenship in 1991, but argued that she lost her status as a US citizen “legally” when she was sworn in as a Taipei city councilor in 1994.
However, the US official said that while serving in a foreign government is one of the legal conditions for loss of citizenship, the US Immigration and Nationality Act also states that such an act must be performed “voluntarily and with intent to relinquish US citizenship.”
Therefore, the formalities mentioned above must be completed, he said.
Under pressure from the Democratic Progressive Party, the legislature adopted a resolution on Friday asking the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to help verify with foreign governments whether any of the sitting legislators hold foreign citizenship.
The move was made in line with Taiwan’s Nationality Act (國籍法), which forbids Republic of China nationals who hold foreign citizenship from assuming public office and requires those with foreign citizenship be removed from their posts.
The American Institute in Taiwan did not respond to a Taipei Times’ e-mail inquiry yesterday on whether a US national could lose his or her citizenship without the formal act of relinquishing it before a US immigration officer.
The Bureau of Consular Affairs’ Web site states that there is no general prohibition on US citizens running for an elected office in a foreign government. However, the eighth clause under Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states that US federal government officers may not accept foreign government employment without the consent of Congress.
With respect to loss of nationality, 349(a)(4) of the US’ Immigration and Nationality Act states that accepting, serving in, or performing duties in a foreign government is potentially an expatriating act if the person is a national of that country or takes an oath of allegiance in connection with the position.
“The threshold question,” the bureau’s Web site said, “is whether the person’s actions fall within the scope of this provision.”
“The prefatory language of Section 349 requires that the expatriating act be performed voluntarily “with the intention of relinquishing US nationality. Thus, if it is determined that the person’s action falls within the purview of 349(a)(4), an adjudication of the person’s intent must be made,” it said.
Given that “the State Department’s administrative practice presumes that US citizens employed in non-policy level positions in a foreign government do not have the requisite intent to relinquish US citizenship, there are no efforts to see out or adjudicate the citizenship of nationals who fall into this category of employment.”
“Efforts also must be made to fully adjudicate such cases to determine one’s intent if the individual serves in a policy-level position in a foreign government. Service in a country’s legislative body is considered by the State Department to be a policy-level position.”
In a situation where holding a foreign office may be incompatible with maintaining US citizenship, each case would be examined on a case-by-case basis.
Kevin Stratford, an immigration lawyer in the US, said that because relinquishing one’s US citizenship is irrevocable, the US government advises individuals to take careful consideration before relinquishing their citizenship.
Even in the case of treason, the court has to thoroughly examine how the person’s action has harmed the interests of the US government before stripping the individual’s citizenship, he said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all