Minister of National Defense Michael Tsai (蔡明憲) yesterday responded to speculation that China would announce plans to remove half of the missiles it has aimed at Taiwan on May 20, the inauguration of president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), saying only that removing and destroying ballistic missiles were two different issues.
Most of China’s missiles are mobile, which means that even if they were removed from Fujian Province to Sichuan Province, they could be redeployed just as quickly, Tsai said.
If China really wants to offer a gesture of good will, simply repositioning the missiles would fall short, Tsai said.
Tsai said that in addition to the 1,400 short range missiles aimed at Taiwan, China also had long range ground to ground missiles with a range of 1,000km to 2,000km, and some missiles with a range up to 8,000km.
Military officials have said that each of China’s missile units has more than one launch position. These positions are connected by road networks, allowing for quick repositioning.
Officials have also said that it is very difficult to differentiate between live launch sites and dummy sites.
The missiles are transported on wheeled mobile launch vehicles, which means that they can be moved quickly by road. This means that missile units that are out of firing range from Taiwan can be moved within range in a matter of half a day, officials said.
Even if China were to remove half of its missiles, officials said, there would still be up to 700 missiles aimed at Taiwan.
Monitoring the movement of missile units could help predict an attack by China, officials said.
Ma has said he will maintain the “status quo” in cross-strait relations, but would like to negotiate with Beijing on “normalizing economic ties, signing a peace treaty and increasing Taiwan’s presence in the international community.”
Ma also said after winning the election that he would ask China to dismantle the ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan as a condition to entering into cross-strait peace negotiations.
A small number of Taiwanese this year lost their citizenship rights after traveling in China and obtaining a one-time Chinese passport to cross the border into Russia, a source said today. The people signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of neighboring Russia with companies claiming they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, the source said on condition of anonymity. The travelers were actually issued one-time-use Chinese passports, they said. Taiwanese are prohibited from holding a Chinese passport or household registration. If found to have a Chinese ID, they may lose their resident status under Article 9-1
Taiwanese were praised for their composure after a video filmed by Taiwanese tourists capturing the moment a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Aomori Prefecture went viral on social media. The video shows a hotel room shaking violently amid Monday’s quake, with objects falling to the ground. Two Taiwanese began filming with their mobile phones, while two others held the sides of a TV to prevent it from falling. When the shaking stopped, the pair calmly took down the TV and laid it flat on a tatami mat, the video shows. The video also captured the group talking about the safety of their companions bathing
PROBLEMATIC APP: Citing more than 1,000 fraud cases, the government is taking the app down for a year, but opposition voices are calling it censorship Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday decried a government plan to suspend access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書) for one year as censorship, while the Presidential Office backed the plan. The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday cited security risks and accusations that the Instagram-like app, known as Rednote in English, had figured in more than 1,700 fraud cases since last year. The company, which has about 3 million users in Taiwan, has not yet responded to requests for comment. “Many people online are already asking ‘How to climb over the firewall to access Xiaohongshu,’” Cheng posted on
A classified Pentagon-produced, multiyear assessment — the Overmatch brief — highlighted unreported Chinese capabilities to destroy US military assets and identified US supply chain choke points, painting a disturbing picture of waning US military might, a New York Times editorial published on Monday said. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s comments in November last year that “we lose every time” in Pentagon-conducted war games pitting the US against China further highlighted the uncertainty about the US’ capability to intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. “It shows the Pentagon’s overreliance on expensive, vulnerable weapons as adversaries field cheap, technologically
RSS