Mon, Aug 13, 2007 page3

• ANALYSIS: Shih Ming-teh indictment inspires new round of call sfor end to `outdated' law

  • By Shih Hsiu-chuan / STAFF REPORTER
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Although the Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) is not high on the average person's list of worries, it is a relic of the Martial Law Era that risks encroaching on their freedom of assembly and speech when they most need it, activists said yesterday.

  No significant amendments have been made to the law since it was enacted in 1988. Minor revisions were made in 2002 that did not change the basic nature of the law, which the activists said suppresses the right to demonstrate rather than protecting freedom of assembly and speech.

  When Shih Ming-teh (施明德) and 15 others were indicted on Aug. 3 for violating the law during street protests last October, activists took up the cause of calling for an amendment with renewed fervor.

  Prosecutors said that the protests -- aimed at forcing President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to resign over a spate of corruption scandals surrounding the first family -- were held without permission from the police. Prosecutors also said that 16 protesters did not disband when ordered to do so by police.

  The main criticisms against the law concern the requirement that demonstrators apply for a permit and the power granted to police to disperse demonstrators in the name of maintaining public order.

  Wei Pei-hsuan (魏培軒), director of the legal department at the Taiwan Association of Human Rights, said that two regulations empowering police to impose restrictions on the time, place and method of protest had been designed specifically to weaken demonstrations.

  "It should be the public, not the police, that has absolute discretion to decide in such matters. First of all, freedom of assembly and association is a right protected in the Constitution. Secondly, the setting of the time and place is key in deciding the success or failure of a protest," Wei said.

  Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation, said the law had been introduced against the backdrop of a regime struggling to retain its power following the end of 38 years of martial law.

  Now that the nation is a successful democracy, society views protests as common and acceptable, Lin said, but it is "frustrating" that the KMT and DPP have not shown interest in amending an "outdated" law.

  "The law is lagging far behind advances in society's perception of demonstrations. It's hard to believe that the DPP has turned into a conservative party in this regard," Lin said.

  Since the DPP came to power in 2000, only once has the government proposed an amendment to the law, in which it suggested repealing the article stipulating that people cannot make communist or seperatist statements at demonstrations.

  The amendment, which followed a ruling that the article was unconstitutional, cleared the legislature without objections, but lawmakers across party lines took the opportunity to amend the law to incorporate stricter regulations into other articles.

  Under the amendment, the official residences of the president and vice president, foreign embassies, the official residences of ambassadors and offices of international institutions were designated as off limits for demonstrations.

  In addition to the 16 participants in last October's demonstrations who stand charged, many protesters campaigning for education, labor and environmental reforms have been charged with violating the law.

  The number of indictments for violating the law has risen, according to data compiled by Chen Po-chien (陳柏謙), a member of the Youth Labor Union.

  Chen, who was accused of violating the law after participating in a demonstration in support of the rights of leprosy sufferers in front of the Presidential Office in 2005, said that protests held by ordinary activists and nonprofit organizations were more vulnerable to the law than rallies led by politicians.

  "The police often take a hard line against protests by relatively disadvantaged people but don't interfere when there are lawmakers present," Chen said.

  Chen called it ironic that police enforced their power selectively.

  "Isn't it true that disadvantaged people need to voice their concerns more than politicians?" Chen asked.

  Dozens of non-governmental groups formed an alliance last year, calling on the government to replace the law with their version, which they called the "assembly and parade protection law."

  The alliance was created in part to support Lin Por-yee (林柏儀), then a student at National Chengchi University picked up by the police when he and around 30 classmates asked for a meeting with officials in front of the Ministry of Education to discuss its plan to raise tuition fees.

  To ensure the public's freedom of assembly, the alliance suggested revoking the police's authority to grant permits and their power to disperse a rally based on their own judgment.

  The alliance also said it was inappropriate for the law to threaten criminal prosecution and to designate certain locations as off limits for demonstrations.

  Their "assembly and parade protection" proposal, however, has not been put on the legislative agenda, although some lawmakers presented it in a formal proposal late last year.

  Lawmakers across party lines are reluctant to amend the law, although some pan-blues have voiced support for it, Lin said.

  The DPP's stance seems tied to "timing," he said, as it only spoke in favor of amending the law during the celebration of the lifting of martial law.

  "The KMT seemed to be half-hearted in the matter, which might be because it believes that it will return to power next year," Lin said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Taiwan ranked as the cheapest travel destination

  • 3

    Wolves hold off Lakers 116-104 to take series lead

  • 4

    Taiwan in Time: Taiwan’s first high school for Taiwanese students

  • 5

    Taiwan would benefit from integrated theater: expert