The four Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential aspirants continued their pre-primary wrangling yesterday, this time with a spat over the relationship between the Constitution and the "one China" framework.
In an interview with the Chinese-language daily China Times published yesterday, Premier Su Tseng-chang (
Su said that there was no "one China" relationship between Taiwan and China, adding that no one should confuse "[Taiwan and China as] the same country."
He said that bringing up such issues only confused people about Taiwan's national identity.
The premier said that people wouldn't be "speaking out" against Hsieh if his remarks didn't carry influence, making them worry about the issue.
Hsieh quickly responded to the premier's remarks.
"When I said there is a `one China' framework in the Constitution, I didn't mean that was my platform. Instead, what I want is to make reforms," Hsieh said at a press conference in the legislature yesterday.
Asserting that he was the first premier to stress the need to change the Constitution, Hsieh said "How could it be possible that I stand for a constitution based on a one-China principle?"
Hsieh said his comments were being misrepresented because of the approaching presidential primary, saying he had only meant to describe the Constitution.
Vice President Annette Lu (
"I don't know whether Hsieh has made himself clear on this, but I don't get it," Lu said when asked to comment on the spat.
Meanwhile, another would-be presidential contender joined the fray by dredging up remarks made by Hsieh more than six years ago, when he said that unification with China should not be a ruled out as an option for Taiwan.
"Hsieh's argument that the Constitution endorses the `one China' policy and that unification with China is an option deviates from the party's basic values," DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun said when approached by reporters about the kerfuffle.
Yu was referring to the DPP's official platform, which states that Taiwan and China are two different countries and that the party will pursue formal independence from China.
On Sept. 6, 2000, when Hsieh was serving as DPP chairman, he said in a radio interview that the party did not exclude unification with China as a future option.
Hsieh said that the DPP's 1999 "Resolution on Taiwan's Future" (
"After the resolution was made, the DPP recognized that Taiwan is an already independent country whose name is `Republic of China.' The party's goal is to maintain the status-quo. The party takes a cautious approach in determining whether Taiwan will unify with China, but that is not excluded as an option," Hsieh said at the time.
Still, Yu took great pains to say he felt sorry for what he called the "infighting between Hsieh and Su," saying the DPP's primary mechanism was a model of democracy for ethnic Chinese communities.
The DPP primary consists of an "opinion poll" that counts toward 70 percent of a decision as to who will be nominated as the party's candidate.
A vote by party members counts for 30 percent of the decision.
In an interview with Happy Radio early yesterday, Yu also said that the DPP's "Resolution on Taiwan's Future" should be replaced by a resolution concerning "normalization" of the country.
The 1999 resolution recognizes the nation's title as "Republic of China," while emphasizing Taiwan's sovereignty.
Saying that the resolution and Chen's "four noes" pledge are all "products of a specific time and space," Yu said the nation would not pay a big price for pursuing independence.
"This is because Taiwan's most important ally, the US, and its Congress will understand that the 23 million people in Taiwan favor independence and support the nation's normalization," he said.
"The US' `one-China' policy will eventually break down and be relaxed," he added.
He said that it would be impossible for China to to attack Taiwan right after he, if elected president, declared independence, because such an action would not be "legitimate."
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all