A former senior Clinton administration official in touch with leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait says there is a possibility that President Chen Shui-bian (
Kenneth Lieberthal, the National Security Council's senior director for Asian Affairs under former US president Bill Clinton, said that both Chen and Hu realize that their ultimate objectives of independence and unification will not be "operationally feasible" during their terms in office, and so they could be forced to reach an agreement essentially pushing resolution back to the next generation of leaders.
On his side, Hu realizes that pushing unification is destabilizing, and Chen realizes the same thing when it comes to pushing independence.
Lieberthal, a University of Michigan professor currently in Washington for a stint with the Brookings Institution think tank, made his comments during a luncheon with a group of Washington correspondents for Taiwanese media outlets.
He feels that the visits by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) could be the opening round of a series of events that could lead to Chen-Hu negotiations in the next year or two.
Once the negotiations started, it would take the two about a year-and-a-half to reach agreement.
"They will be long, hard negotiations. So it is important to get started pretty soon," he said.
Lieberthal is a regular visitor to both Taipei and Beijing.
He last met with Chen in Taipei on April 11, in an unpublicized trip to discuss current cross-strait developments. He refused to disclose the contents of the talks or to characterize Chen's comments.
However, he said that Chen does want stability, and that his main dilemma is how to achieve it without giving up his core principals, which include striving for eventual independence.
"Chen is prepared, if the opportunity is there, to take some fairly bold steps to establish long-term stabilization of cross-strait relations in a way that does not compromise Taiwan's future, but rather enhances its future," he said.
"That leaves Chen open to opportunities that do not decide Taiwan's long-term future but which establishes ground rules for dealing with the long term future," Lieberthal said, "if Beijing is really interested in this."
Hu's aims are parallel, Lieberthal feels. He did not minimize the difficulties negotiations would face, but said that any pact would have to forswear both Taiwanese independence and Chinese use of force at least for the coming decades.
One main problem, he said, is the bitterness of Taiwan's domestic politics. To overcome this, he said, one of the requirements would be for Lien to reach out to Chen, and not try to isolate him politically.
"My guess is that [Lien] may well seek to use it for partisan purposes," he said.
"There is at least a possibility of surprisingly constructive cooperation" between Chen and Hu, Lieberthal said.
He would not comment on whether the US played a role in bringing about the current cross-strait diplomatic developments but said he felt the Bush administration's position was "absolutely right," which, he conceded, was quite an admission for a Clintonite.
That position is to promote dialogue for a peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues, welcome any dialogue, and stress the importance of Beijing's ultimate need to talk directly with Chen.
Lieberthal said that Hu was "surprised" by the outcome of last year's Legislative Yuan elections, having expected the pan-greens to win a majority of the seats.
That expectation explains why Hu had pushed so hard to get the "Anti-Secession" Law put on the National People's Congress agenda by the Standing Committee last December.
After the KMT's victory in the elections, Hu made many changes in the text of the law to make it more of a document seeking stability and downplaying bellicose statements, Lieberthal said.
In addition, Hu made positive mention of the 10-point agreement reached by Chen and Soong.
"It is extraordinary, it is unprecedented for the secretary-general of the Chinese Communist Party to refer positively to any specific thing the president of Taiwan has done," Lieberthal said.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS