His recent trip to China was made "in the economic interest of the Taiwanese people," said Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Chiang Pin-kun (江丙坤) yesterday, adding that he does not believe that there was any conflict between the KMT's long-time Republic of China stance and its collaborative efforts with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
During an interview with the local television network China Television Company (CTV) yesterday afternoon, Chiang talked about the 10-point CCP-KMT agreement, the invitation to KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) to visit China and the ensuing controversy that his recently-concluded trip to China has produced.
While most of the points in the agreement have to do with the development of cross-strait commercial, transportation and trade ties -- and can be implemented with or without Taiwanese support -- some of the points will need the approval of the government, Chiang said yesterday.
 
                    PHOTO: CNA
In particular, the proposal regarding media interaction across the strait and direct charter flights needs government sanction, Chiang said.
The KMT will most likely choose to execute the proposals from the Taiwanese side via the party's legislative caucus, he added.
Many of the points in the agreement were ideas previously forwarded by the Council of Economic Planning and Development, Chiang said, adding that the agreement reflected the needs of the China-based Taiwanese business community.
Speaking prior to his interview, Chiang said that his trip had been made in the economic interests of the Taiwanese people.
"For Taiwan, economic development is most important," Chiang said.
Only by helping the nation's economy through improving cross-strait financial exchanges can Taiwan increase its visibility on the international scene and improve cross-strait relations, he added.
Chiang also said yesterday that in all his interactions with the CCP, he had been open and firm about the KMT's adherence to the Republic of China's sovereignty.
"I was very clear that we defend the Republic of China and urged the CCP to consider the Taiwanese people, not from the perspective of Beijing, but from the point of view of Taipei. Our talk was in an open, peer-to-peer environment," Chiang said, adding that he did not feel that the dignity or status of the Republic of China had been diminished or lessened by his meeting with the communists.
Responding to domestic criticism about the legality of the agreement reached between the KMT and the communists, Chiang said that since the KMT and the CCP did not formally sign an agreement, he does not believe that he violated the Act Governing Relations Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例).
The act, which states that civil servants and government officials -- including lawmakers -- cannot negotiate or execute agreements with Beijing without authorization from the government, has been cited by Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Council Vice Chairman Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) in their criticism of the KMT delegation.
While he did not believe the trip's legality was an issue, Chiang and the 34 other members of the delegation to China would have no problem defending themselves in court should they be charged with violating the act.
A focus of the interview yesterday was the invitation from Jia Qinglin (賈慶林), chairman of the People's Political Consultative Conference, to Lien that was made during Jia's meeting with Chiang in Beijing on Thursday.
It is unlikely that Lien will make the trip prior to or directly after the National Assembly elections on May 14, Chiang said.

The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of

Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading

‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to