Sat, Nov 06, 2004 News Editorials 497565189 visits
 Photo News
 More Taiwan News
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    Arms budget has no add-ons, says vice minister

    WEAPONS: Service and maintenance of the weapons systems will not require spending outside of the ordinary annual defense budget

    CNA, Taipei
    Saturday, Nov 06, 2004, Page 4

    Vice Minister of National Defense Tsai Ming-hsien (½²©ú¾Ë) said yesterday that the special budget of NT$610.8 billion (US$18.23 billion) for arms procurements from the US will obtain three major items and will not require extra major spending afterwards, as had been speculated.

    Tsai was referring to the special budget to buy six batteries of anti-missile Patriot III missiles, eight diesel-electric submarines and a squadron of 12 anti-submarine aircraft over a 15-year period starting 2005, saying that all relevant weaponry systems and parts are included in the special budget.

    He said that the government will monitor spending carefully, adding that the expenditure for repair and maintenance, as well as the logistics for the three major arms procurement items, will be appropriated in annual budgets and will not require a need for further special budgets.

    Tsai made the remarks during an question and answer session in the Legislative Yuan, reaffirming again the necessity and importance of obtaining the weapons.

    Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wang Chung-yu (¤ýÁé´ü) questioned remarks by Premier Yu Shyi-kun that those who oppose the arms procurement are in the same league as China, which he said has blocked the opportunity for rational debate on the issue.

    The premier pointed out that China is the one who least wants Taiwan to procure arms.

    Yu also said that the items in the new package are more advanced and therefore more expensive than those purchased in the past and that the legislators should not question the government on the items or the spending, but should engage in rational debate.
    This story has been viewed 1474 times.

  • Advertising