"March 19 Shooting Truth Investi-gation Special Committee" (三一九槍擊事件真相調查特別委員會) has been the past week's most popular item on search engines as the nation's Internet surfers eagerly tracked the panel's mishaps.
For instance, the committee invited Tainan prosecutors who were investigating the March 19 assassination attempt on the president and vice president to its Taipei office for discussion of the case on Thursday. The prosecutors did not appear, so the committee tried to visit them in Tainan instead. On Friday, it invited the National Police Agency's Criminal Investigation Bureau Commissioner Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to the office. Hou did not appear.
Hou said that his decision not to appear before the committee was based on orders from the Cabinet.
"I was merely following my superior officer's order," Hou said. Hou said both the committee and and the police investigation could encounter problems if police and prosecutors transfer their investigation results to the controversial panel.
"For instance, we are currently working on more than ten tips that may possibly lead us to the arrest of the gunman. How do we `transfer' these tips to them, given that the committee does not have any professionals to continue our work? And since they have the authority to direct us, it is quite possible that they will ask us to continue our surveillance of certain suspects. If that is the case, then what is the meaning of the transfer?" Hou said.
The commissioner said that he wants to solve the case, and that he would definitely cooperate with the committee if all the allegations that the committee is illegal were resolved.
Minister of the Interior Su Jia-chyuan (
Su echoed Hou's concern, asking what would happen to evidence once the police and prosecutors transfer to the committee all the materials that they have collected and analyzed. Su asked how the evidence would be handled or protected, since there is no armed protection at the committee's office. Evidence in criminal cases must be kept in secure custody if it is to be used in subsequent legal procedures and trials.
Article 21-2 of the Criminal Code says "An act performed by a public official in the course of his duties and pursuant to the order of his superior is not punishable unless such public official knew that such an order was contrary to law."
Hou's concern highlights some of the major legal problems with the panel: Which government body does this committee belong to? Where does its budget come from? How long will the committee exist?
"Currently, the committee does not belong to any government bodies. It is something outside the government system, something outside the Constitution. That creates a lot of problems," said Examination Yuan President Yao Chia-wen (
Regarding its monetary problems, the committee's spokeswoman, Wang Ching-fong (
"We need at least approximately NT$10 million to maintain operations here. Currently we can only rely on our 17 members' own contributions to pay all necessary expenses, and we have paid at least NT$200,000," Wang said. "I really do not know how much longer we can do this. But this is unacceptable."
In response to Wang's claim, Chief Accountant Hsu Chang-yao (
Premier Yu Shyi-kun said that the statute stipulates that "the Cabinet shall not decline the committee's request for necessary funding." But it does not say that the committee is authorized for unlimited budget requests without further approval by the Legislative Yuan.
According to the statute's Article Eight, the committee has the authority to investigate all "potential criminal allegations" that may concern the March 19 assassination attempt. But the article does not clearly define what "potential criminal allegations" entail.
"What are potential criminal allegations? Does a committee member have the authority to indict anyone now that they can order around prosecutors, which is obviously against the Constitution?" Vice Minister of Justice Hsieh Wen-ding (
Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
In the meantime, Article Nine says that committee members have the authorization to order or direct prosecutors and military prosecutors, but it does not say whether prosecutors shall quit whatever they are working on whenever they are requested to provide their services to committee members.
In addition, whoever is summoned and interrogated by committee members does not have the constitutional right to remain silent. "This is obviously against human rights," Chen said.
Article 13 says that "the case must be reheard if the court's decision does not match the commit-tee's investigation."
"I take that as a humiliation of all our prosecutors, judges and police officers as well as all fellow law enforcement officers," Chen said.
The minister said he is also afraid that this article may be used to meddle in two other legal cases filed by the pan-blue camps to request the high court to suspend or invalidate President Chen Shui-bian's (
While the president was meeting with Harvard Law Professor Jerome Cohen last Tuesday, he noted that the panel does not need search warrants, summonses or arrest warrants, and that it is authorized to command prosecutors and military prosecutors as well as police, military police and other law enforcement officers whose jobs concern national security and public order.
Currently, to carry out a raid or an arrest, all law enforcement officials require warrants from prosecutors or approved by judges. The committee has the authority to interrogate suspects without first seeking a warrant, and the suspects have none of their ordinary constitutional protections.
In addition, the statute specifies that those who do not cooperate with these sweeping powers can be fined up to NT$1 million or sentenced to two to three years in jail and banned from leaving the country. By law, the request to ban somebody from leaving the country needs to be filed by prosecutors and approved by judges before the order is carried out.
"This is ridiculous," the president said. "Taiwan is a democratic country, but we still have such an outrageous law that is against human rights."
Despite being criticized, Wang said that it is the committee's goal to solve the case of the assassination attempt. Since the panel was created by a law passed by the Legislative Yuan, she demanded that everyone follow, respect and trust in the committee.
"We will keep inviting related personnel for interrogation. If they do not come, we will visit them in person," Wang said.
While the pan-green camp is trying to suspend the statute by filing a request for a Constitutional interpretation from the nation's grand justices, they also appended a request for a temporary injunction against it, and hoped that this would suspend the committee's actions before the interpretation is made.
The grand justices have scheduled debates over the request for a temporary injunction on Oct. 14, Oct. 27 and Oct. 29.
The debates will concern what authorization the committee has, whether the Legislative Yuan's authorization to make new laws has constitutional limits, whether the Legislative Yuan is authorized to empower the panel, whether the statute violates the Constitution and whether it compromises duly constituted authorities' jurisdictions.
The grand justices invited to the debates five representatives on behalf of the applicant for the temporary injunction request, five lawmakers, three Control Yuan members, two officials from the Ministry of Justice, two from the Ministry of the Interior and two from the Judges' Association.
NATIONAL SECURITY: Authorities are working to confirm the identities of the military personnel involved and investigating possible illegal conduct and regulatory violations Authorities are probing possible national security implications after Kinmen police and immigration officers on Sunday found a Chinese woman allegedly posing as a tourist while engaging in prostitution involving more than 10 military personnel. The woman, surnamed Chen (陳), has since been deported, authorities said, adding that investigators are still working to confirm the identities of those implicated, as the records only listed code names and aliases. The case stemmed from a report received by the Kinmen District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday last week from the Jinhu Precinct of the Kinmen County Police Bureau. On Sunday, police, along with the National Immigration
GLOBALGIVING: ‘ Caving to external pressure is not acceptable for an organization that has cultivated justice reform and human rights for 30 years,’ one NGO said A slew of non-government organizations (NGOs) have withdrawn from the GlobalGiving fundraising platform after it announced it would use “Chinese Taipei” instead of “Taiwan” from next month. The Taiwan Good Rice Association wrote on Facebook on Friday that it was informed on April 28 via a teleconference call of the change, which was made because the platform wanted to operate in China. Taiwan Good Rice is to terminate all cooperative relationships with GlobalGiving in response to the platform’s “unilateral and non-negotiable” decision to remove references to Taiwan, the NGO said. “Taiwan is in the official name of Taiwan Good Rice Association and the
HEAVY WEATHER: Typhoon Jangmi is due to crash straight into the Ryukyus as airlines look to shift flights to larger aircraft or cancel flights to Okinawa entirely Taiwan’s international air carriers announced flight adjustments over the weekend as Typhoon Jangmi is forecast to hit the Ryukyu Islands today and tomorrow. The Central Weather Administration (CWA) upgraded Jangmi from a tropical storm to a typhoon at 8am yesterday, with the eye located 580km south of Naha city. It was moving north at 19kph. Today, China Airlines’ CI-120, CI-121, CI-122 and CI-123 flights between Taoyuan and Naha, Okinawa, have been canceled as well as CI-132 and CI-133 between Kaohsiung and Naha. EVA Air’s BR-112, BR-113, BR-186 and BR-185 flights between Taoyuan and Naha are also canceled. Low-cost carrier Tigerair Taiwan canceled IT-230,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday briefed her party’s Central Standing Committee regarding her scheduled visit to the US between Monday next week and June 16, saying that her purpose would be to persuade the US that the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution was a “one China” constitution that would foster stable and peaceful cross-strait relations. The ROC Constitution is the most important defense for all Taiwanese citizens, as it upholds our democracy and has contributed to our robust economy, which aligns with international and US interests, she said. “We would not be troublemakers and drag the US under,”
RSS