The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) declined yesterday to comment on Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) statement in London that Beijing will seriously consider making a unification law, a move believed to be a counter to President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) constitutional reform agenda.
Council Vice Chairman Chen Ming-tong (
On Sunday, Wen, who took a 10-day trip to parts of Europe including Germany, the UK and Italy, met with Chinese embassy officials, businesspeople, students and some representatives of overseas Chinese in London.
One representative of an overseas Chinese group suggested during the meeting that China make the unification law as soon as possible because the law might help Beijing solve its sovereign disputes with Taiwan peacefully.
Wen said the suggestion was "very important" and promised to give serious thought to it.
Chinese academics, including Zhang Nianchi (
Wen is believed to be the first Chinese leader to formally respond to the idea.
Zhang, in an interview with the Chinese-language newspaper the United Daily News, said he was not surprised by Wen's verbal endorsement of the idea.
The academic published an article in March to illustrate the urgency for Beijing to create the law in the light of Taiwan's referendum and constitutional reform planned for 2006.
In his article, Zhang described the referendum and constitutional reform as legal efforts to "legitimize Taiwan's independence."
Over the years, Beijing has been busy curbing all possible moves to pursue Taiwan's independence and ignored laws made in Taiwan that may help the island achieve its desired status, according to Zhang.
It is Chen Shui-bian's timetable for constitutional reform that alarmed Beijing about the possibility of Taiwan's independence being attained through legal work, Zhang said, adding that Taiwan has forced China to consider making the unification law.
Contents of the law, Zhang said, will give clear definitions to "unification," "separation" and "Taiwan's independence." The law shall also map out stages to achieve unification and approaches to reach the aim.
The law shall also regulate how to counter moves towards Taiwan's independence. It would provide legal measures to handle independence actions.
"Peace is one way to achieve unification; war is the other," said Zhang.
Therefore, Zhang said, while the law should say how to unify with Taiwan through peaceful means, it also should define conditions under which war is permitted.
However, Chang Wu-yen (張五岳), a professor at the Institute of China Studies in Tamkang University, said it is highly unlikely Beijing would pass the unification law.
Wen's answer to the request to make the law was not surprising, the professor said. On that occasion in London, "it would be really strange if Wen did not say the unification issue was very important," he added.
Chang said Wen responded to the idea of the law only when asked by his audience.
"He was passively answering a question," he said.
If China unilaterally makes the law without taking Taiwanese people's opinions into account, the law will be unrealistic, Chang said.
"Hong Kong's Basic Law was not made by Beijing alone, either," he said.
"What both sides really need now is a peace and stability framework," Chang said.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang