A little more than half of all Taiwanese oppose the idea of the US using nuclear weapons in a military confrontation between China and the US over Taiwan, according to a survey released yesterday.
According to the Public Opinion Research Foundation, roughly 56 percent of the survey's 1,083 respondents were against the idea, while 22 percent were supportive and 21 percent were unsure.
The poll follows reports that the US is updating its nuclear doctrine from a Cold War policy of massive retaliation to a more flexible system that would allow a pre-emptive strike against hostile countries that threaten to use weapons of mass destruction.
The proposed policy, called "offensive deterrence," would give the US the option of conducting a pre-emptive strike with conventional bombs or nuclear weapons.
Identified as potential targets in a future conflict were China and North Korea and the non-nuclear states Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria.
"Although we welcome US support of Taiwan, we'd really hate to see the US use such an extreme measure to protect us," Tim Ting (丁庭宇), chairman of Gallup in Taiwan, said of the survey's results.
The poll was conducted between March 13 and March 18 via telephone.
The poll question did not mention that the US was adjusting its policy to deter its enemies from using weapons of mass destruction.
Details of the US policy are contained in excerpts from the Pentagon's nuclear posture review, which was sent to the US Congress in January. The last nuclear posture review was completed in 1994.
Ting said yesterday that President Chen Shui-bian (
"Although the DPP government has described itself as an anti-nuclear party, it has failed to comment on the issue since the report was made public," Ting said. "I think the president owes the nation an explanation on the government's stance."
The poll covers other subjects in the news, including the issue of whether Taiwanese firms should be allowed to invest in eight-inch wafer plants in China.
Of the poll's respondents, 39.8 percent said they agreed that chip firms should be allowed to invest in China, while 36.5 percent said they disagreed.
Chou Yang-san (周陽山), a political analyst from National Taiwan University, said the polarization of public opinion wouldn't help the government reach a final consensus.
The Cabinet is due to make a final decision by the end of this month.
In addition, the poll found that roughly 41 percent of the respondents favored a proposal to rename the nation's representative offices abroad to include the name "Taiwan."
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been spearheading efforts to use "Taiwan" rather than "Taipei" for the offices in those places where the ROC -- Taiwan's official name -- is not allowed due to lack of diplomatic recognition.
More than 39 percent of the respondents agreed with the view that Mongolia is a sovereign state and not a part of China. The Cabinet at the end of January signed off an amendment to exclude Mongolia as a part of ROC territory.
Finally, roughly 35 percent of the people questioned favored the TSU's proposal to designate Hokkien as a national language alongside Mandarin.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
Greenpeace yesterday said that it is to appeal a decision last month by the Taipei High Administrative Court to dismiss its 2021 lawsuit against the Ministry of Economic Affairs over “loose” regulations governing major corporate electricity consumers. The climate-related lawsuit — the first of its kind in Taiwan — sought to require the government to enforce higher green energy thresholds on major corporations to reduce emissions in light of climate change and an uptick in extreme weather. The suit, filed by Greenpeace East Asia, the Environmental Jurists Association and four individual plaintiffs, was dismissed on May 8 following four years of litigation. The
The New Taipei City Government would assist relatives of those killed or injured in last month’s car-ramming incident in Sansia District (三峽) to secure compensation, Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said yesterday, two days after the driver died in a hospital. “The city government will do its best to help the relatives of the car crash incident seek compensation,” Hou said. The mayor also said that the city’s Legal Affairs, Education and Social Welfare departments have established a joint mechanism to “provide coordinated assistance” to victims and their families. Three people were killed and 12 injured when a car plowed into schoolchildren and their