Sun, Sep 18, 2016 - Page 12 News List

Brazil’s sporting party winds down

WHAT LEGACY?Infrastructure built in Rio de Janeiro for the Olympics has been touted as transformational for the city, but critics said progress has come at a cost


China’s Zhou Jingjing and Eva Andrea Hajmasi of Hungary compete in the women’s foil team wheelchair fencing Paralympic gold-medal match at the Carioca Arena 3 in Rio de Janeiro on Friday. China won gold.

Photo: Reuters

Brazil has been partying hard for five years, hosting a string of international mega-events that end today with the Paralympics. So is it time for the hangover?

There was the 2014 FIFA World Cup, the Confederations Cup, the Rio+20 UN environmental summit, World Youth Day with Pope Francis and then the Olympics last month and the Paralympics this month.

At each stage, the same fears of catastrophic delays — or worse — were raised.

And each time Brazil defied its doubters, sending its guests home happy.

It has been a grueling path, coinciding with a precipitous decline in the once-booming economy and a correspondingly sharp rise in political instability.

Dilma Rousseff was ejected from the presidency on the eve of the Olympics and her replacement, Brazilian President Michel Temer, was loudly booed at the opening ceremony.

Meanwhile, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who as president saw Brazil win the bidding to host the World Cup and Olympics, is now facing serious corruption charges.

As the economy continues to struggle in deep recession, a debate is under way over whether the billions spent on preparing for the events have left lasting infrastructure improvements or just a lot of useless vanity projects.

The World Cup came in for scrutiny after staging the tournament in 12 cities, some of them with no strong soccer market, such as the capital, Brasilia, Manaus and Natal in the northeast. Stadiums built for the event in these cities have since sat largely unused.

It was the approximately 8 billion reais (US$3.4 billion in 2014) price tag for the stadiums that drew hundreds of thousands of Brazilians to protest, demanding the money instead be spent on transport, health and education.

The World Cup cost 25.5 billion reais to put on, the most expensive in history, while the far bigger Olympics, at 38 billion reais came in less than the London 2012 Games and far under the previous Beijing costs.

Olympic organizers called these the “budget Games,” emphasizing that 57 percent of funding came from private, not state sources.

“Rio is a success story and when we don’t get a national investor, we get an international partner,” Rio de Janeiro Deputy Mayor Rafael Picciani said.

The city also said that the Olympic arenas will get continued use and not end up as white elephants.

Still, there are skeptics.

“The local sporting industry is small in comparison to these events. And what private enterprise is going to want to run a velodrome when what people really like here is football?” asked sports market specialist Erich Beting, editor of the Negocio del Deporte blog.

A white elephant is not the worry, Beting said.

“The risk is a herd of white elephants,” he said.

The World Cup legacy projects were meant to include transport improvements as far apart as Sao Paulo, Fortaleza, Cuiaba and Recife, but not only were they not completed — they are still unfinished and showing no sign of going anywhere, Globo television reported in March.

Rio de Janeiro tried to avoid these problems, saying that the Olympics would transform the ramshackle city for the better.

A new metro line and bus system for example have raised public access to mass transport from 18 percent to 63 percent. New public spaces and schools have been built and areas of the once dirt and dangerous city center have been restored.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top