As Newcastle United fans smolder with indignation at the renaming of their St James’ Park stadium to the “Sports Direct Arena,” a scout around the sporting world suggests they might instead count their blessings.
For while the rebranding of the 119-year-old venue has enraged many of the English Premier League soccer club’s supporters, this fiscally motivated move would appear mild compared with some steps taken by team owners, leagues and athletes to boost their bank balances.
Thai boxers, for example, think little of changing their names. A highly rated flyweight, the former Prasitsak Papoem, now goes by the moniker of Kwanpichit 13 Rien Express, after a Bangkok eatery.
A bantamweight by the name of Pichitchai Twins Gym also earns his living in the ring, though presumably he is no close relation to super bantamweight Petch Twins Gym, featherweight fighter Kompetch Twins Gym nor even a distant cousin to Komrith Eveready-Gym. Samson 3-k battery, meanwhile, was a powerful super flyweight who retired with a 43-0 record.
Since the early days of British soccer club shirt sponsorship in the 1970s and 1980s and British show-jumping horses named after double-glazing firms, there has been an influx of commercialization in sport and of the rebranding of sporting properties.
Get it right
However, as one sports branding expert said, it is key to get the fit between sponsor and property right.
“Successful naming rights deals are rare things,” Singapore-based James Scholefield said. “There’s no doubt that newly built stadia do offer brands great opportunities to ‘own’ real estate from a branding point of view, but more importantly to embed themselves in the everyday argot of fans and, indeed, the media.”
“I would argue, however, that by rebadging an existing stadium, at best brands are unlikely to get the all-important emotional buy-in of fans and at worst, they could end up alienating the very people they are seeking to influence,” he said.
“What would-be sponsors really need to ask themselves is whether the additional spend for naming rights on top of having your logo on the team shirt — and the hundreds of thousands worn by adoring fans — is really money well spent,” he added.
Newcastle are only naming their ground after owner Mike Ashley’s company Sports Direct until they find a sponsor to take over the full naming rights on a permanent basis.
Sponsors too must consider their position carefully.
“Any sponsor giving serious thought to the opportunity at Newcastle will be thinking long and hard about the risk-reward ratio,” Scholefield said. “On the plus side, Newcastle are a globally recognized ‘brand’ in footballing terms, with a large and passionate supporter base and an iconic stadium.”
In the 1990s, college football players in the US competed for the Poulan Weed-Eater Independence Bowl. Vying for top spot among some of the wackier named year-enders in that sport have been the Beef ‘O’ Brady’s Bowl, the Chick-fil-A Bowl and the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl.
However, even college football’s food-based nomenclature must take a back seat to motorsport in the US.
Consider NASCAR — drivers at the Michigan International Speedway will next year once more race for the “Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400.”
That race could be forgiven for suffering an identity crisis, having undergone a number of name changes, from the initial, sober “Motor State 500” in 1969, to the superheroic 2005 “Batman Begins 400” and the more-than-a-mouthful “3M Performance 400 Presented by Post-it Picture Paper” a year later.
With minor league baseball boasting “Whataburger Field” in Texas, Rhode Island sporting a “Dunkin’ Donuts Center” and League of Ireland soccer side Drogheda United playing their home matches at “Hunky Dorys Park,” suddenly Newcastle’s “Sports Direct Arena” seems a sober, and fitting, choice.
Shohei Ohtani and his wife arrived in South Korea with his Los Angeles Dodgers teammates yesterday ahead of their season-opening games with the San Diego Padres next week. Ohtani, wearing a black training suit and a cap backwards, was the first Dodgers player who showed up at the arrival gate of Incheon International Airport, west of Seoul. His wife, Mamiko Tanaka, walked several steps behind him. As a crowd of fans, many wearing Dodgers jerseys, shouted his name and cheered slogans, Ohtani briefly waved his hand, but did not say anything before he entered a limousine bus with his wife. Fans held placards
Taiwan’s Tai Tzu-ying yesterday advanced to the quarter-finals at the All England Open, beating Kim Ga-eun of South Korea 21-17, 21-15. With the win, Tai earned a semi-final against China’s He Bingjiao, who beat Michelle Li of Canada 21-9, 21-9. Defending champion An Se-young defeated India’s P.V. Sindhu 21-19, 21-11. An on Wednesday cruised into the second round, unlike last year’s men’s winner, Li Shifeng, who suffered a shock defeat. South Korea’s An, the world No. 1, overcame Taiwan’s Hsu Wen-chi 21-17, 21-16 to set up the match against Sindhu. In other women’s singles matches, Taiwan’s Sung Shuo-yun lost 21-18, 24-22 against Carolina Marin of
EYEING TOP SPOT: A victory in today’s final against Storm Hunter and Katerina Siniakova would return 38-year-old Hsieh Su-wei to the world No. 1 ranking Taiwan’s Hsieh Su-wei and Elise Mertens on Thursday secured a spot in the women’s doubles finals at the BNP Paribas Open after dispatching Nicole Melichar-Martinez of the US and Australia’s Ellen Perez 6-2, 7-6 (7/5) at Indian Wells. Hsieh and her Belgian partner Mertens, who won the Australian Open in late January, coasted through the first set after breaking their opponents’ serve twice, but found the going tougher in the second. Both pairs could only muster one break point over 12 games, neither of which were converted, leaving the set to be decided by a tiebreaker. Hsieh and Mertens took a 6-3 lead,
DOUBLES PAYBACK: Hsieh Su-wei and Elise Martens avenged their defeat in the quarters at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open against Demi Schuurs and Luisa Stefani Taiwan’s Hsieh Su-wei on Wednesday advanced to the semi-finals of the women’s doubles at the BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells, California. Hsieh and partner Elise Mertens of Belgium dispatched Demi Schuurs and Luisa Stefani 6-1, 6-4 to set up a clash against Nicole Melichar-Martinez of the US and Australia’s Ellen Perez for a spot in the final of the WTA 1000 tournament. Hsieh and Martens made a blistering start to their rematch after they lost to Schuurs and Stefani in the quarter-finals at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open last month, winning three games without reply at the start of the first set