Michel Platini, at one time the outstanding French soccer player of his day, dropped by Jerusalem earlier this month. He was received by Israeli President Shimon Peres and the two men discussed what role soccer might play toward peace in the Middle East.
The pair had been down this road once before. Three years ago, Peres and Platini helped put together a team of Israelis and Palestinians who took on a Spanish team in Seville. Now, Platini is the initiator. He visited Jerusalem in his capacity as the head of UEFA and offered Israel the prospect of hosting international tournaments if enough stadiums could be built.
Platini is trying, for a second time, to transform soccer. He fought in his school days for the sport to be an accepted profession in France. He transcended his game as a creator who could and did transform his generation. And he made his fortune in his father’s homeland, with the Italian club Juventus.
But in his second career, the often excruciating transition that professional sports figures face, Platini is taking on an even more difficult task.
Platini seeks something rather complex. He is trying to unite under a common set of operating principles the 53 members of UEFA: 27 states inside the EU and 26 outside it, including the whole of the former Eastern European bloc, and nations that lie outside the geographic borders such as Turkey and Israel. His ambition is to level the playing field between rich teams, those with TV contracts and billionaire owners, and the smaller fry who rely mostly on fan support.
He would like to rein in teams like Real Madrid, which spent US$433 million this summer to buy the rights to four superstars, and the big name teams from the high-level English Premier League. Some of these, like Chelsea and Manchester United, are bankrolled by sugar daddies from Russia, the US and the United Arab Emirates.
In February, Platini addressed the European Parliament for, appropriately, the 90 minutes that it takes to play a soccer match.
In an interview, he spoke about the January trading period, in which star players are transferred for millions of dollars from small market clubs to the dominant teams, which then sign the players to expensive contracts. One club in England, for example, bid US$150 million for the registration of a single player, the Brazilian Ricardo dos Santos Leite, known as Kaka, from AC Milan. (He ultimately signed with Real Madrid.)
“Is it morally acceptable to offer such sums of money for a single player?” Platini asked the lawmakers.
He said he would do everything he could to ensure that soccer operates within European law provided they amend the law to let him govern the sport. To do that, he said, he needed a US-style system that restricted spending to a percentage of every team’s revenues.
“We are currently looking at the idea of limiting, to a certain degree, a club’s expenditure on staff — salary and transfer fees combined — to an as yet undecided percentage of its direct and indirect sporting revenue,” he said.
Platini wanted to restrict the power of big clubs to sign up large numbers of players, particularly those under the age of 18. European law, however, prohibits any quota system that would deny the rights of workers to be employed anywhere they or the clubs choose. Restrictions on competition for players or on the right of workers to seek maximum compensation — familiar fixtures in the landscape of US sports — are illegal.
RSS