The family of professor Chen Wen-cheng (
Chen's death, together with the murders of former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung's (
Since Chen was, at the time of his death, an assistant professor at a US university, his demise attracted international attention.
Concerned that any interview might unduly influence the lawsuit, Chen's older sister, Chen Pao-yueh (陳寶月), who filed the suit, declined to discuss the case. But according to Chinese-language media, her family has sought an explanation from the government for 20 years.
Their father, Chen Ting-mao (陳庭茂), had wished to discover the facts surrounding Chen's death before he died.
The family had expected that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who often spoke of Chen's case during his campaign to become a Taipei City councilor in 1981, would help after he took office, but, disappointed, they decided to act by themselves.
One of Chen Pao-yueh's attorneys, Lee Sheng-hsiung (
"We expect to learn more information about Chen's death from the five defendants' accounts and TGGH materials obtained through the prosecutor's investigation," Lee said.
Chen had been a vocal critic of the KMT government at Taiwanese student union meetings in the US, which brought him to the attention of the government.
Government officials claimed that he had admitted setting up 10 foundations in the US to raise money for Formosa magazine, a dissident journal, but Chen's friends were doubtful of the claim.
Chen's body was found at National Taiwan University on the morning of July 3, 1981, after the TGGH had interrogated him.
The body had thirteen broken ribs, a broken spine and numerous other internal and external injuries consistent with his having been severely beaten.
A US forensic pathologist, Cyril Wecht, who traveled to Taiwan to investigate the case, concluded that Chen's death was caused by being dropped from the fifth floor fire escape of the university research library while unconscious and that his death was a homicide.
The garrison headquarters initially claimed that Chen had committed suicide because he feared being arrested for his crimes, but changed its account the following day, saying he had died in an accident. Chen's family and friends, however, refuse to believe that Chen would commit suicide.
Chen was an assistant professor at Carnegie Mellon University in the US, and his death attracted much attention and pressure from the international community.
Republican congressman Jim Leach proposed a congressional investigation into Taiwanese espionage in the US.
The State Department held investigative hearings in July and August, 1981. The president of Carnegie Mellon University, Richard Cyert, sent a message to the president at the time, Chiang Ching-Kuo (
Professors and presidential advisors who experienced the martial law period insist that the truth behind miscarriages of justice must be revealed and the government should apologize to and compensate victims.
Huang Chao-tang (
The government actually started work on redress for victims of miscarriages of justice during the martial law period when the Legislative Yuan passed a regulation providing for compensation in 1998. But the current administration has not taken up the matter.
Compensation had already been paid in 2,786 cases to the end of June this year. It requires the victim to have been interrogated and detained for at least one day.
Chen's case, however, doesn't qualify since he wasn't detained.
Huang criticized the criteria, saying, "Not only can Chen's case not be counted, there are a lot of victims who were just arrested and beaten without record. How can they be compensated?"
In 1994, the Control Yuan started a further investigation into Chen's death, but, concluding that the case was a criminal case, decided that it did not have the jurisdiction to investigate it and transferred it to the Ministry of Justice.
"From the investigation, we found a couple of suspicious points about his death, such as the body was found too close to the building from which he allegedly jumped, and his injuries didn't look like injuries resultant from a fall, as the postmortem report stated," said Chou Jung-yao (趙榮耀), a member of the Control Yuan committee which investigated the case.
"Investigation of these points, however, is a matter for a criminal investigation, which we didn't have the right to conduct," Chou said.
Hsieh Tsung-min (謝聰敏), an advisor to the president and the justice ministry -- and also a victim of the white terror -- said that the Control Yuan couldn't have discovered anything new without the right to conduct a criminal investigation.
"The Control Yuan can't really do a good job of an investigation without jurisdiction. The justice ministry is the organization that could investigate these unsolved cases, but as an advisor to the justice ministry, [I can tell you that] the ministry doesn't have the resources to investigate all of these cases.
"The victims and their families can take action through the judicial process, which I think is the best way," Hsieh said.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s