Having been isolated from the international human rights system for decades, Taiwan is soon to have its first domestic law which covers a range of international human rights standards.
As a fulfillment of President Chen Shui-bian's (
The basic law, which incorporates the spirit of the International Bill of Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, covers protection for civil, political, educational, social and economic rights.
It also specifies protection for such groups as women, children, the elderly and Aborigines, as well as for laborers' rights and soldiers' rights.
To effectively enforce human rights standards, the basic law will prevail over other domestic laws in legal application. That is, any domestic law will be amended when it is found to violate the standards declared in the basic law.
"With the coming of this law, there will be an overhaul on all domestic laws so as to get the idea of human rights down to earth,"said officials from the Ministry of Justice, who are charged with the task of drafting the bill.
For years Taiwan's human rights activists have been worried about the country's isolation from the UN-led international human rights system as a result of its peculiar political situation.
Having been an outsider since 1971, when Taiwan's membership in the UN was replaced by China, it has rarely been a concern of the Taiwan government or the general public as to how the international community has developed a series of universal human rights standards.
Domestic research on this topic has been rare, and collections of books, documents and archives related to human rights have also been sparse in national or university libraries.
Presidential promise
It was a fresh idea when the president, in his inauguration address last May, pledged to incorporate the International Bill of Rights ? The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), as well as the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) -- into the domestic legal system.
As a matter of fact, few know that Taiwan, in the name of the ROC government, had signed several international human rights conventions, which include the ICCPR and the ICESCR, before 1971.
According to research by Hwang Jau-yuan (黃昭元), associate professor at the law school of the National Taiwan University, Taiwan had signed at least 11 human rights treaties and had even ratified seven of them before 1971 when it was still a UN member.
However, since 1971, the documents on these treaties have been shelved at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and have remained inaccessible to the public.
Under such circumstances, these human rights treaties carry no legal or domestic weight. They are hardly ever applied in court judgements and few individuals would think of claiming their rights under these treaties.
However, Peter Huang (黃文雄), a well-known human rights activist, is making a difference with his own case.
Huang, who once attempted to assassinate late President Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) in New York in 1977, had been blacklisted and stopped from returning to Taiwan since the incident.
In 1996 he finally came back to the country by secret means, but he was then charged with violating the National Security Law for illegal entry.
Through the legal proceedings, the former chairman of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights (
During court hearings, he from time to time cited international human rights standards to assert his rights in the criminal procedure.
In his defense against the illegal entry charge, he contended that any citizen shall have the right to return to their own country, as specified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the ICCPR.
As Taiwan had been a signatory to the ICCPR, the court should take the treaty into account when delivering its judgement, Huang argued.
It is unknown at this moment whether Huang, whose case is pending a constitutional review, will succeed in calling attention to the long-ignored human rights treaties.
However, he has certainly exposed the ambiguous status of these treaties and called for a reflection on the gap between the domestic legal system and international human rights standards.
Establishing boundaries
Though human rights issues are supposed to be universal and without boundaries, they are invariably influenced by politics. That Taiwan remains isolated from international human rights system is an obvious example of this kind.
Beijing, while it is denying the national status of Taiwan, has also denied the effect of the treaties the KMT government signed before 1971, calling the signing and ratifying of these treaties as "illegal, null, and void." The UN also holds that these treaties are not binding on the Beijing government.
Taiwan has made no attempt over the decades to clarify the effect of the treaties, to which it had been a signatory, nor has it mentioned the possibility of its accession to these and other international human rights conventions.
"I think the UN will welcome Taiwan applying international human rights standards domestically, but it wouldn't carry any legal weight internationally," said an official from the foreign affairs' department of treaty and legal affairs, on condition of anonymity.
He said a state has to ratify and finally deposit instruments of ratification to the institution specified in the treaty, following signing or declaring accession to a treaty.
"We could declare accession and ratify a treaty on our own, but problems would come at the final phase of deposit. It's unlikely to be accepted," he said.
Taking action
However, some international law scholars, such as Hwang Jau-yuan, think Taiwan should take a more active role in the international system through its accession to human rights conventions.
They argue that some of the conventions have evolved as customary international law and Taiwan would be bound by these conventions, though it is not a member.
On the other hand, they believe to become a member of the human rights conventions is a sensible approach for Taiwan to strengthen its links with the international community.
"There must be a difficult and complicated process to go through if we are going to tackle the issue of the international treaties. Even domestically, I expect there'll be a heated row in the legislature in the process of ratification. But it'll be stupid not to go forward this way," said Kenneth Chiu (
The attorney, who is considered as a possible candidate for ambassador-at-large, thinks the creation of the Human Rights Basic Law has in essence "confirmed" the effectiveness of the treaties Taiwan had signed before 1971.
In the future, there will be other legal reform and the establishment of the National Human Rights Commission. The legal system has therefore signaled an intention by Taiwan to keep up with international human rights standards.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s