Premier Tang Fei (
Anti-nuclear legislators and legal experts, however, said the legal basis to terminate the project lay in the Constitution, which takes precedence over the Budget Law.
Controversy over the legal basis to terminate the power plant project was stirred on Monday when Lin Chuan (
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
According to the article, the government may only stop drawing on a budget in the case of a national emergency. Whether the condition applies to the power plant case, however, is uncertain.
Lin's opinion was echoed yesterday by KMT officials, who are in favor of nuclear energy.
Answering legislators' questions, Premier Tang said yesterday that the Ministry of Economic Affairs was reviewing the final recommendation made by its Fourth Nuclear Power Plant Re-evaluation Committee (
"No matter what suggestions are made by the Executive Yuan, they are only to give the DPP more information," said Tang, adding that the future of the plant would still be decided in accordance with the law.
Meanwhile, law professors urged yesterday that officials and legislators consider the issue based on both Article 70 of the Constitution, as well as Interpretation No. 391 of the Council of Grand Justices.
"The Executive Yuan will not break the law at all if it fails to execute an approved budget," said Chen Tzu-yang (陳慈陽), a law professor at National Taipei University, at a public forum held at the Legislative Yuan.
Taking the power plant project as an example, Chen said that all the Executive Yuan had to do was to give reasons for not executing the budget. Simply, the Executive Yuan has to explain how the original purpose of building the power plant -- to provide the public with sufficient power -- will be achieved by others means.
Anti-nuclear legislators said yesterday that the project had become a pawn in a political struggle.
"I regret the actions of some who stressed that there was no legal basis for halting the project," said KMT Legislator Jao Yung-ching (
"They should have respected the suggestions of experts in the economic affairs ministry's task force for a review of the project," Jao said.
New Party legislator Hsieh Chi-ta (謝啟大) said the New Party was producing a pamphlet against the nuke project, which gives reasons from a variety of perspectives, ranging from law, economics and energy, to sustainable development.
The KMT, on the other hand, revealed yesterday the results of a survey on the public's attitude toward the project. KMT officials said that 55 percent of interviewees supported continuation of the project. In addition, KMT officials said, 55 percent of interviewees would not welcome higher electricity prices caused by the halt of the project.
The survey questioned 1,097 residents over the age of 20 in 24 administrative districts.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS