Caucus leaders in the National Assembly yesterday spelled out their opposition to constitutional amendment proposals intended to abolish the Council of Grand Justices or limit the Council's power in interpreting the Constit-ution, just two days after they were introduced.
The proposals, which were first raised by KMT deputy Hsieh Ming-hui (謝明輝) after the Council invalidated two amendments adopted by the Assembly in September 1999, are widely considered a retaliatory measure against the grand justices.
The proposals managed to pass an Assembly review on Sunday, winning 138 and 167 votes respectively.
But the KMT, DPP, New Party and People First Party caucuses yesterday all specified that they were against the proposals, and that they would not allow them to continue.
"If the Council is to be abolished or go through any major adjustments, more in-depth discussion and research needs to be done. It is inappropriate to do it now," said Alex Tsai (
The proposed amendments would still need to go through a confirmation procedure in a plenary session on Friday, to decide whether they can go through second and third readings.
Any amendments must be endorsed by at least three-quarters of the attending deputies to pass second and third readings, and two-thirds of Assembly deputies must be attendance.
In addition to the two proposals, another issue concerning the grand justices that has been raised is whether the office of a grand justice should be permanent in nature.
In what has been criticized by some Assembly deputies as a self-serving step, the Council issued a constitutional interpretation in 1996 to equalize benefits enjoyed by both grand justices and judges.
Under this ruling, the appointment of a grand justice is permanent, and cannot be revoked unless they are convicted on a criminal charge.
The KMT and DPP caucuses, believing that the term of a grand justice should be limited, said they are open to revised proposals on the subject.
"The self-serving ruling was made because the Constitution is unspecific on the terms of grand justices," said Liu I-teh (
"The DPP caucus will not try to stop individual members from supporting the proposal [to limit the term of grand justices] as long as it is not raised in the name of the caucus," Liu said.
The KMT's Hsieh, who initiated the proposal to abolish the Council of Grand Justices, yesterday submitted an additional provision to his original proposal to limit the term of office of a grand justice.
With constitutional reform being recognized as a way to marginalize the Assembly, the marginalization proposal is the only one that has won the support of all caucuses in the Assembly: namely the KMT, DPP, New Party and even People First Party, which had previously expressed disapproval of the proposal.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS