The revised Agriculture Development Act now sitting in the legislature -- the brainchild of the Council of Agriculture under Chairman Peng Tso-kwei (
A 'Pandora's box'
Standing firm on his decision to step down from office, Peng yesterday sternly criticized the government's relaxing regulations over Taiwan's agricultural land-use policy.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
"It would be like opening a Pandora's box," he said, referring to a host of potential problems, such as renewed land speculation, overdevelopment, the further erosion of Taiwan's environment and the disappearance of the remaining land actually used to grow crops on.
In fact, the revised version of the Agriculture Development Act, drafted by Peng's agency, differs in only one respect: the controversial article over whether or not to allow houses to be built on newly-sold farm land. The Cabinet version stipulates that only community-style subdivision housing be permitted, while the KMT's new proposal would allow individual homes to be built.
The Cabinet's version of the bill includes two other major proposals: opening up the market for agricultural land (
Aides to Peng have criticized the three articles describing them as a three-legged table, which, once one leg has been damaged, the whole structure will be brought to the ground.
Analysts say, however, that reform on the free trade of farm land must be undertaken in order to introduce both capital and modern technology into agriculture as Taiwan nears entry into the WTO.
They said even Peng agreed about that.
However, the core of the issue, according to Peng, lies in housing development.
"If barriers to lowering the price of agricultural land are dropped, and people are allowed to subdivide it into portions, and if we begin granting permission to build on newly purchased farm land, I'm afraid that agricultural land will be washed away on a massive scale," Peng said.
Critics also worried that if the ban on building farm houses on newly sold agricultural land is lifted, some land, especially those plots located in city suburbs, will be swallowed up by conglomerates. Furthermore, they said, in the name of building farm houses, they may actually feed the trend of mansion-style housing complexes.
"This would also endanger the progress of our agricultural modernization," Peng said.
To consolidate his policy position, Peng raised other questions regarding the KMT legislative caucus' alternative proposal.
"If every single farm plot becomes full of farm houses, we can neither proceed with large scale hi-tech agricultural cultivation, nor spray insecticide from the air," Peng said.
While saying they understood Peng's argument, representatives from local farmer's associations said that as long as the ban continues on building new housing on farm land, there is no incentive for anyone to purchase agricultural land.
"If the cabinet does not lift the ban on housing construction on farm land, I believe there would not be enough incentive for buyers," said Wu Ming-hui (吳銘輝), an official from the Taichung County Farmer's Association.
"Whether building a brand new complex or leaving a boundless green field, the contribution to the village is the same," Wu added.
Local farm leaders said that while they understood where Peng's policy was coming from, they had no choice but to consider their self interest first.
Lin Jing-yuan (
"If a farmer can count on earning a living on his land, then no farmer would want to sell his land," he said.
Farming doesn't pay
The statement reveals a crucial problem in Taiwan's agricultural sector: namely, that farming doesn't pay. According to current statistics, local farmers say that the more crops they actually plant, the more financial losses they accrue, leading to a cycle of debt and massive government subsidies for farmers.
"Farmers are so poor that if farmer associations refuse to grant loans to them, I suspect the banks would also be reluctant to extend credit to land tillers," Lin said.
To further illustrate the fact that agricultural land is worthless as long as current policy holds, Lin pointed to the difficulty of unloading land onto the market.
"We have a plot of farmland in our hands, and we have tried to auction it off at least six times. But nobody wants to buy it," he said.
"I can't imagine who, if the construction of farm houses is prohibited on newly sold agricultural land, would want to buy farmland," Lin said.
Experts, however, have challenged the contention of local farmers, saying once the ban on newly purchased agricultural land is lifted, the land itself would become a gambling chip used by giant corporate conglomerates.
"The price of Taiwan's agricultural land has long occupied the No.1 spot worldwide. Once we loosen restrictions over agricultural land use, it might create short-term advantages. But in the long term, once land supply exceeds market needs, prices will drop dramatically," said Lin Kuo-ching (
"I agreed with Peng's stance. Agricultural land can preserve the nation's ecology. However, I would beg people not to ignore the problems of framers while serving themselves."
"If everyone wants to live happily, then everyone has to pay the price," he said.
Chen Chi-nan (陳其南), the dean of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Chiao Tung University, also said a balance is needed between national and regional interests.
"On the one hand, the farming industry and agricultural land is a national heritage, and also an asset for future generations. But on the other hand, the livelihood and interests of farmers who live and look after the land on our behalf need to be shared by all citizens,'' Chen said.
FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION: The UK would continue to reinforce ties with Taiwan ‘in a wide range of areas’ as a part of a ‘strong unofficial relationship,’ a paper said The UK plans to conduct more freedom of navigation operations in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea, British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Lammy told the British House of Commons on Tuesday. British Member of Parliament Desmond Swayne said that the Royal Navy’s HMS Spey had passed through the Taiwan Strait “in pursuit of vital international freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.” Swayne asked Lammy whether he agreed that it was “proper and lawful” to do so, and if the UK would continue to carry out similar operations. Lammy replied “yes” to both questions. The
‘OF COURSE A COUNTRY’: The president outlined that Taiwan has all the necessary features of a nation, including citizens, land, government and sovereignty President William Lai (賴清德) discussed the meaning of “nation” during a speech in New Taipei City last night, emphasizing that Taiwan is a country as he condemned China’s misinterpretation of UN Resolution 2758. The speech was the first in a series of 10 that Lai is scheduled to give across Taiwan. It is the responsibility of Taiwanese citizens to stand united to defend their national sovereignty, democracy, liberty, way of life and the future of the next generation, Lai said. This is the most important legacy the people of this era could pass on to future generations, he said. Lai went on to discuss
SECOND SPEECH: All political parties should work together to defend democracy, protect Taiwan and resist the CCP, despite their differences, the president said President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday discussed how pro-Taiwan and pro-Republic of China (ROC) groups can agree to maintain solidarity on the issue of protecting Taiwan and resisting the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The talk, delivered last night at Taoyuan’s Hakka Youth Association, was the second in a series of 10 that Lai is scheduled to give across Taiwan. Citing Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui’s (蔣渭水) slogan that solidarity brings strength, Lai said it was a call for political parties to find consensus amid disagreements on behalf of bettering the nation. All political parties should work together to defend democracy, protect Taiwan and resist
By refusing to agree spending increases to appease US President Donald Trump, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez threatened to derail a summit that NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte needs to run smoothly for the sake of the military alliance’s future survival. Ahead of yesterday’s gathering in The Hague, Netherlands, things were going off the rails. European officials have expressed irritation at the spoiler role that Sanchez is playing when their No. 1 task is to line up behind a pledge to raise defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. Rutte needed to keep Spain in line while preventing others such as Slovakia