The terms extensions of the National Assembly and the Legislative Yuan may have become law when President Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) promulgated this year's constitutional amendments on Sept. 15 -- but the furor over the extensions shows no signs of dying down.
The KMT's expulsion of National Assembly Speaker Su Nan-cheng (蘇南成) from the party -- and therefore also from his post -- on Sept. 8, made him the scapegoat for the affair, but has done little to calm the uproar.
Meanwhile, the DPP's assembly caucus leaders -- who worked with their KMT counterparts to get the extensions passed -- continue to claim the package was the maximum reform effort possible, given the current political climate.
PHOTO: TAIPEI TIMES
Critics, however, say that it is too early to determine whether the term extension amendment will prove to be good medicine or poison for the congressional reform effort.
Under the amendment, the length of the current National Assembly term was extended by two years and 48 days to June 2002; the voting process for the next assembly election was changed to a proportional system, in which seats will be divided up according to the ratio of votes each party gains in that year's legislative elections; and the number of deputies was reduced from the current 316 to 150. The next legislative elections were also postponed from December 2001 to June 2002.
The deputies passed the amendment despite strong objections from both the DPP and the KMT party headquarters, as well as a lack of public support.
DPP assembly caucus leader Liu I-deh (
"Even though we want to perform a surgical operation to remove the `political appendix,' we have to first give it an anesthetic injection,'' he said, referring to the DPP's long-standing view of the National Assembly as an unnecessary institution.
"In using a `sweetener' [of term extensions] to lure the support of deputies in exchange for a proportional representation system, such a deal could not be more profitable," he said.
"My proposal aimed to abolish the assembly by means of suicide," Liu added.
Others such as Wu Nan-jen (吳乃仁), a member of the DPP's Central Standing Committee, echoed Liu's belief.
"Even though we cannot abolish the assembly in the short term, a proportional system can help prevent the situation from getting any worse. If we continue to hold assembly elections, I can guarantee that the quality of deputies will continue to decline," Wu said.
"I would rather chain the monster-like assembly with a proportional system than allows unrestrained elected deputies to amend the constitution however they like," he added.
Some academics dismiss the "reform" vocabulary, saying there is nothing to guarantee such reform aims will be acted upon. Or, as one scholar put it, the "reform cloak has become no more than a `final refuge' for political scoundrels.''
Beyond the actual reform considerations, however, deputies from both the DPP and the KMT admit that if they failed to cooperate to pass the controversial amendments with the required three-fourths majority (as happened in the previous assembly session), they would have run into more difficulties in the new session.
"In a newly-elected assembly next March [if there had been no extension] there would likely have been more than 100 deputies supporting KMT maverick presidential candidate James Soong (
But critics said the term extension package not only violated the deputies' basic mandate with the electorate, but is bound to have a negative influence on their motives.
"The ends can never justified the means -- and the ends are almost unreachable," said Nan Fang Shou, a prominent political critic.
"A fixed term length is the fundamental principle of democracy. No other reason could overthrow that basic rule of the game. So how could the deputies extend their terms by more than two years without asking the permission of voters them-selves?" he added.
Other academics expressed doubts over the blueprint for the assembly's future drawn up by the two parties' delegates, saying that although the assembly will now be chosen by proportional representation, that in itself will not necessary result in the abolition of the assembly.
"The only thing I can see the term extension doing is merely changing the electoral approach of deputies -- the authority of the deputies' offices still remains unchanged. And we have to wait at least six years to evaluate the effects of the new arrangements, so at this point there are few clues as to how to actually abolish the assembly," said Chen Shin-min (
Hu Fu (胡佛), a renowned constitutional expert from National Taiwan University, pointed out that even if the assembly adopts a totally proportional system, that in itself can do little to fix the assembly's institutional problems, and could in fact add to them.
"Imagine if there is no re-election pressure. The assembly could end up becoming a stage for the three major parties to put pressure on their own deputies, make their own demands, then dividing the spoils among themselves," Hu said.
Scholars say there are other possible contradictions that would come with a proportional system, including the rationalization of the "division of labor" between the as-sembly and the legislature.
The assembly's current exclusive powers, for example, include both confirmation of senior governmental officials and amending the constitution.
"It would be rather odd to see constitutional amendments proposed by the legislature still having to earn the approval from assembly deputies -- who are themselves chosen as a result of the election of lawmakers," Chen said.
Furthermore, analysts stressed, the Constitution is an "end value" by itself, not a tool for political infighting.
"The Constitution is a fundamental law, not candy. How can we use it to serve another purpose?" Hu asked.
Basically, Hu said, a legal framework by itself is never enough to bring out mature democratic politics. He cited the example of the recently introduced proportional system, saying once it is transplanted to Taiwan, it will forever change the island's political landscape.
"The law by itself is never enough," Hu said. "Taiwan has implemented reforms since 1990, but the more reform we introduced, the more we actually backpedaled, and neither the parties nor the public have been able to identify the proper criteria for developing democracy."
Critics such as Nan said nobody can deny achieving reform carries a price, and that the core of the issue will be how high the price is and how long will it take.
NEXT GENERATION: The four plants in the Central Taiwan Science Park, designated Fab 25, would consist of four 1.4-nanometer wafer manufacturing plants, TSMC said Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) plans to begin construction of four new plants later this year, with the aim to officially launch production of 2-nanometer semiconductor wafers by late 2028, Central Taiwan Science Park Bureau director-general Hsu Maw-shin (許茂新) said. Hsu made the announcement at an event on Friday evening celebrating the Central Taiwan Science Park’s 22nd anniversary. The second phase of the park’s expansion would commence with the initial construction of water detention ponds and other structures aimed at soil and water conservation, Hsu said. TSMC has officially leased the land, with the Central Taiwan Science Park having handed over the
AUKUS: The Australian Ambassador to the US said his country is working with the Pentagon and he is confident that submarine issues will be resolved Australian Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd on Friday said that if Taiwan were to fall to China’s occupation, it would unleash China’s military capacities and capabilities more broadly. He also said his country is working with the Pentagon on the US Department of Defense’s review of the AUKUS submarine project and is confident that all issues raised will be resolved. Rudd, who served as Australian prime minister from 2007 to 2010 and for three months in 2013, made the remarks at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado and stressed the longstanding US-Australia alliance and his close relationship with the US Undersecretary
‘WORLD WAR III’: Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said the aid would inflame tensions, but her amendment was rejected 421 votes against six The US House of Representatives on Friday passed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal 2026, which includes US$500 million for Taiwan. The bill, which totals US$831.5 billion in discretionary spending, passed in a 221-209 vote. According to the bill, the funds for Taiwan would be administered by the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency and would remain available through Sept. 30, 2027, for the Taiwan Security Cooperation Initiative. The legislation authorizes the US Secretary of Defense, with the agreement of the US Secretary of State, to use the funds to assist Taiwan in procuring defense articles and services, and military training. Republican Representative
TAIWAN IS TAIWAN: US Representative Tom Tiffany said the amendment was not controversial, as ‘Taiwan is not — nor has it ever been — part of Communist China’ The US House of Representatives on Friday passed an amendment banning the US Department of Defense from creating, buying or displaying any map that shows Taiwan as part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The “Honest Maps” amendment was approved in a voice vote on Friday as part of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for the 2026 fiscal year. The amendment prohibits using any funds from the act to create, buy or display maps that show Taiwan, Kinmen, Matsu, Penghu, Wuciou (烏坵), Green Island (綠島) or Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼) as part of the PRC. The act includes US$831.5 billion in