The Taipei Lantern Festival has been held for 10 years. When the 10-day festival is over, the main lantern — which is made in the shape of the zodiac animal for the current year — will most likely be disassembled and recycled as garbage. Statistics compiled by a Taipei City councilor suggest that more than NT$60 million has been spent on main lanterns in just the past five years.
The Taipei City Government’s Department of Civil Affairs said that at the end of the festival each year, businesses are given the opportunity to “adopt” the main lantern, but due to high disassembly, transportation and maintenance costs, companies give up on the idea after their evaluation. The civil affairs department has considered putting the lanterns along the riverside, but the Water-Conservancy Act doesn’t allow it. In recent years, every attempt has been made to make the main lantern out of environmentally friendly materials, and it is then placed at the entrance of the Ziqiang Tunnel so that it can be exhibited for at least another year before being recycled.
The Taipei Lantern Festival was first held in 2001. The city’s civil affairs department raises funds from private enterprise and the average budget is between NT$70 million to NT$80 million every year. Statistics provided by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Shu-hua show that the main festival lantern accounts for the largest part of the budget. Every year, the civil affairs department stresses the need to be more environmentally friendly, but they don’t hesitate to spend money, and their vows to promote energy saving and environmental protection become empty slogans.
Photo: Liu Rong, Liberty Times 自由時報記者劉榮攝
Using the Auspicious Tiger, the main lantern from the festival last year, the year of the tiger, as an example, it was installed at the Dazhi entrance to the Ziqiang Tunnel for “reuse.” As the year of the tiger is over, the Baby Rabbit, this year’s main lantern, will be placed at the same spot at the end of the current festival. The Auspicious Tiger, which cost more than NT$17 million, will soon be dismantled and sold as scrap iron.
Hsu said she proposed the idea that main lanterns should be reused back in 2007, but that the plan for relocating the main lantern of the Taipei lantern festival proposed by the city government the following year was merely superficial in nature. All lanterns from the recent years of the pig, the rat and the ox have been recycled, a fate none of the lanterns managed to escape.
Hsu feels that since the plans to relocate the lanterns cannot be implemented, the city government should review the budget for the main lantern, or seek donations from private enterprise in order to introduce activities sponsored through private donations to the festival as a substitute. Not only could this save between NT$70 million to NT$80 million of taxpayers’ money each year, enterprises would also be able to market and create an image for themselves. Future events would then spark more creativity and become more interesting than the current annual routine.
(LIBERTY TIMES, TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU)
台北燈節今年屆滿十年,每年依照生肖年訂製的造型主燈,十天燈節展期結束後,都難逃被肢解淪為資源回收廢棄物,台北市議員統計,光是過去五年,主燈就花掉逾六千萬元。
台北市府民政局表示,每年燈會結束,主燈都會開放企業認養,礙於拆裝、搬運及保固費用過高,企業評估過後都選擇放棄,民政局曾考慮過擺在河岸,但受限水利法也無法如願,近幾年的主燈製作,儘可能採用環保材質,並選擇在自強隧道入口處,讓生肖主燈展出至少一年再回收。
台北燈會從二零零一年開始舉辦,由民政局向私人企業募款,平均每年預算都在新台幣七、八千萬元以上,民進黨北市議員許淑華統計,主燈幾乎是台北燈會預算最高的項目,民政局每年都強調將檢討「環保化」,但燒錢毫不手軟,節能環保都已淪為口號。
以去年虎年燈會的主燈「福氣虎」為例,燈節後被擺在自強隧道大直端入口「再利用」,隨著虎年結束,原地點將在兔年燈會結束後放置今年的主燈「玉兔貝比」,造價新台幣一千七百多萬元的「福氣虎」,近日內也將被肢解,當廢鐵賣掉。
許淑華表示,她在二零零七年曾提出主燈再利用的構想,結果市府隔年提出的「台北燈節主燈再設置計畫」,完全只是表面功夫,近來豬年、鼠年、牛年的主燈全部回收,無一倖免。
許淑華認為,既然主燈再設置計畫無法落實,台北市政府應該檢討主燈預算,或尋求民間企業贊助,引進民間資源招募燈節活動作為替代方案,如此一來不僅可以節省市民每年新台幣七、八千萬的納稅錢,企業本身可達到行銷宣傳及形象營造的效果,未來活動將會更有創意與看頭,不會像現在淪為每年行禮如儀的大拜拜。
(自由時報記者劉榮)
The debate surrounding Taipower’s recent corporate identity reboot has gone well beyond the design community. The controversy began after Taipower replaced the familiar “Taiwan Power Company” wording — widely regarded as the calligraphy of Yu You-ren (1879-1964), former Control Yuan president and master calligrapher — with a modern logotype by designer Aaron Nieh’s team, Aaron Nieh Workshop. Taipower said the change was not a wholesale replacement of old signage, but an “optimization of its identity system,” aimed at meeting the needs of digital media, electronic bills, apps, social media graphics and various small-format applications. Existing physical markings, such as building
Since 2005, the third Monday in January has come to be known as “Blue Monday.” In other words, that day is believed to be the most depressing day of the year. This concept seems logical at first. After all, Monday marks the start of the school or workweek after two days of rest and fun. Also, blue is a color that is often associated with sadness. Furthermore, in many parts of the world, January is a time when the weather is cold, rainy, and gloomy. But is there any scientific proof that this January day is truly sadder than any of
Continued from yesterday(延續自昨日) https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/lang For the most part, the idea of “Blue Monday” has been rejected as a myth. Some mental health experts also say there is a danger in labeling a certain day as the most depressing time of the entire year. Some argue that if people expect to feel sadder on the third Monday in January, this belief alone may increase their anxiety. One group that is worried about the negative effect of believing in Blue Monday is Samaritans. A mental health charity based in the UK, Samaritans is working to turn Blue Monday into “Brew Monday.” In this
As bee populations around the world continue to decline at an alarming rate, scientists are developing an innovative solution: robotic bees. Recent advances at research institutions like Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US have produced tiny flying robots capable of performing pollination tasks similar to those of real bees. These tiny machines represent an impressive technological achievement. MIT’s latest models can hover in the air for over 1,000 seconds and perform complex movements, demonstrating the agility needed for successful pollination. The robots are designed to mimic the flight patterns of natural bees, offering potential support to agriculture