Tue, Apr 16, 2019 - Page 1 News List

Aussie media challenge charges over Pell trial coverage

AFP, SYDNEY

The lawyer defending Australia’s biggest news organizations against contempt charges for their reporting of Cardinal George Pell’s sex crimes conviction yesterday denounced what he called an unprecedented attack on press freedom in the nation.

Twenty-three journalists and 13 media firms face fines and prison terms for allegedly breaching a gag order not to report on last year’s trial of Pell for child sex abuse.

Pell, 77, the most senior Catholic cleric convicted of sex crimes, was found guilty in December last year of abusing two choirboys and is serving a six-year prison term. He has appealed the conviction.

The court had banned all reporting of the case pending a second trial scheduled for this month, but the gag order was lifted in February when that trial was canceled.

Some foreign media, including the New York Times and the Washington Post, reported Pell’s conviction in December, while local media ran cryptic articles complaining that they were being prevented from reporting a story of major public interest.

The Australian media and reporters are accused of abetting contempt of court by the foreign press and of “scandalizing the court” by breaching the suppression order, despite none of them reporting on the charges involved or mentioning Pell by name.

If convicted, journalists face prison terms of up to five years and the news organizations fines of up to A$500,000 (US$360,000).

Matthew Collins, representing the accused media at the first hearing on the matter yesterday, said such wide-ranging contempt charges had “no precedent” in Australian legal history.

“There are simply no cases of which we are aware in Australia where media organizations, editors or journalists have been charged, much less found guilty, of contempt in circumstances such as these,” he was quoted by local media as telling the court in Melbourne.

Collins added that a guilty verdict on any of the charges would have a “chilling effect” on open justice in Australia.

He added that the contempt allegations lacked specific examples of how any of the accused news companies or journalists actually breached the gag order when they never mentioned Pell or the crimes for which he was convicted.

The accused include Australia’s two biggest newspaper companies, Rupert Murdoch’s Nationwide News and the former Fairfax group now owned by broadcaster Nine, as well as leading newspaper editors and reporters.

Judge John Dixon agreed that prosecutors had not provided sufficient detail of the charges against each news organization and journalist, asking: “Does this involve one trial or 36 trials, or something in between?”

He ordered prosecutors to provide detailed statements of claim to the accused and set a new hearing for June 26.

This story has been viewed 11517 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top