Legislators yesterday criticized the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for avoiding references to the Republic of China (ROC) in its congratulatory letter to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ahead of its 19th National Congress.
The KMT dated a letter to the CCP “October 17, 106 (2017),” without adding “Year of the ROC,” which is customary when using the ROC calendar year, which began in 1911 with the founding of the ROC.
The name ROC is also absent from proper text of the letter, despite stating the KMT’s position on cross-strait relations and its desire to engage in dialogue with the CPP.
Photo: Lin Liang-sheng, Taipei Times
The omission sparked outrage among netizens on Wednesday.
KMT spokesman Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) yesterday said the letter was written in a way that follows the spirit of the so-called “1992 consensus,” which he said acknowledges that there is only “one China” and that each side of the Taiwan Strait has its “own interpretation” of what that means.
The KMT and the CCP have a “mutual understanding” to avoid making references to the ROC and the People’s Republic of China in well-wishing notes, Hung said.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, not the KMT, is “harming 23 million Taiwanese” by failing to smooth cross-strait relations and allowing the Mainland Affairs Council to atrophy, Hung said.
“The KMT absolutely does not belittle the ROC or make it disappear,” he said, adding that netizens should judge the Tsai administration by the same standards that they judge the KMT.
It was “stylistically absurd” of the KMT to omit the words “Year of the ROC” when using the ROC calendar and its mutual understanding with the CCP is based on “self-deception,” New Power Party Legislator Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明) said.
“The KMT has little tricks. To the CCP, they are meaningless. To Taiwanese, they are the butt of jokes. The KMT is the only party in the world that buys into that shibboleth about ‘one China’ and each side having its own interpretation,” Hsu said. “This letter shows that attempt to pry the name ‘China’ from the CCP is a nonstarter. Our path is to normalize Taiwan as a nation.”
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said on Facebook that the absence of the ROC in the letter belies the KMT’s patriotic rhetoric of respecting the ROC and the flag.
“The KMT’s flattering self-characterization of what it did as in ‘the spirit of the 1992 consensus’ is utter nonsense. The ‘1992 consensus’ is the KMT’s own deception. There was no consensus,” Lin said.
However, former presidential office spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said the Tsai administration did not use the ROC calendar or refer to the nation in its letter of condolence to China in August after an earthquake in Sichuan.
“Where is the ROC in the correspondence sent by the DPP-run Straits Exchange Foundation? Why was ‘our nation’ substituted with ‘our side’? Is Tsai the chief executive of an area or a side?” Lo said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the CCP that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source