Chinese investment in MediaTek Inc (聯發科), a leading handset chipmaker, should be blocked to prevent technology transfer, New Power Party (NPP) legislators, an academic and members of the Economic Democracy Union said yesterday, adding that any exceptions made for the firm would set a dangerous precedent.
“Our semiconductor design industry has a large market in China and it faces a huge amount of pressure to allow direct Chinese investment. Taiwanese government regulations are their strongest defense, because it enables them to tell Chinese firms that no is no and there is nothing they can do,” NPP Executive Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) said.
While most firms in the industry have not publically expressed opposition to the MediaTek deal to avoid Chinese retaliation, many are opposed, because the precedent would lead to further pressure to allow technology transfers by accepting direct investment, Huang said.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
“Opening up to Chinese investment is not motivated by a need for capital — our semiconductor industry does not lack for capital. China’s objective is to use direct investment to secure technology transfers,” he said.
“Semiconductor firms should keep in mind the amount of public resources that were invested into nurturing the industry and put national interests before short-term profit,” Huang added.
MediaTek chairman Tsai Ming-kai (蔡明介) has pushed for a conditional relaxation of the ban on Chinese firms making equity investments in local chip designers as a means to gain greater market share in China and the opportunity to participate in the drafting of 5G wireless regulatory standards.
National Sun Yat-sen University sociology professor Tsai Hung-cheng (蔡宏政) questioned whether Chinese investment would guarantee the firm a role in the drafting of the standards, given China’s lack of proprietary technology.
“The only way the Chinese will make rapid progress in the sector is if they have Taiwanese technology — their primary motivation for investment [in MediaTek] is to make a breakthrough,” he said, adding that any concessions would be met with further Chinese demands for board seats and the establishment of research and development centers in China.
“The government must be proactive and prevent companies from acting purely for their individual interests, because China is willing to give the first firm [that pushes for allowing investment] rich incentives to make the breakthrough possible,” Tsai Hung-cheng said.
Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) rejected assertions that technology transfers could be averted as long as Chinese firms are banned from having board seats in Taiwanese corporations.
“Investing firms would wield significant power as major customers and investors, with the full weight of Chinese government capital to back them up. All they have to do to gain access to technology is demand that Chinese and Taiwanese teams collaborate on product innovations,” he said, adding that there is overly broad executive discretion to approve Chinese investment, given the lack of national regulations.
The Economic Democracy Union is a consortium of nongovernmental organizations that played a central role in organizing initial opposition to the cross-strait service trade agreement.
RESILIENCE: Taiwan plays a key role in semiconductors, energy, information infrastructure and advanced manufacturing, AIT Director Raymond Greene said Taiwan’s continued investment in deterrence and resilience remains vital, especially in uncrewed systems and other emerging technologies, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene said yesterday. Greene made the remarks at the annual National Strategic Summit on Supply Chain Resilience held by the Research Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology (DSET), a government-backed think tank. As Taiwan last year became the US’ fourth-largest trading partner and supply chain security is becoming more important, cooperation in emerging technologies continues to deepen between the two countries, he said. The US is committed to accelerating innovation, building key infrastructure, strengthening cooperation
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
RIGHT DIRECTION: Taiwan’s efforts to prevent forced labor include a proposal to ‘fully prohibit’ employers from withholding workers’ documents, an official said Taiwan is to establish a mechanism to restrict imports of goods linked to forced labor, the Executive Yuan said yesterday, after the US proposed imposing additional tariffs on Taiwanese goods over labor concerns. “The Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Economic Affairs are to establish an interministerial review procedure,” Executive Yuan spokesperson Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said at a news briefing in Taipei. “The government is to use the Foreign Trade Act [貿易法] as the legal basis to restrict imports of goods produced with forced labor” and bring its supply chain governance more in line with international standards on human rights, resilience
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is