Thu, Feb 18, 2016 - Page 1 News List

Japanese 228 victim’s son awarded compensation

NATIONALITY NOT AN ISSUE:Keisho Aoyama said the ruling was ‘a groundbreaking one upholding justice and human rights,’ and thanked those who helped him

By Alison Hsiao  /  Staff reporter

Keisho Aoyama, second left, the son of a Japanese victim of the 228 Incident, yesterday holds his father’s picture at a news conference in Taipei after the Taipei High Administrative Court ruled that he is eligible for NT$6 million (US$190,077) in compensation for his father’s death.

Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times

Less than two weeks before the 69th anniversary of the 228 Incident, the Taipei High Administrative Court yesterday ruled in favor of Keisho Aoyama, the son of a Japanese victim of the massacre, in his compensation request.

The court ruled that he is eligible for NT$6 million (US$190,077) in compensation for his father’s death.

If the 228 Memorial Foundation and the Ministry of the Interior decide not to appeal, the ruling would make Aoyama the first foreigner to be compensated for the 228 Incident, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights (TAHR) said.

Aoyama, from Okinawa, Japan, filed for compensation with the 228 Memorial Foundation in 2011 (officially processed in 2013) for his father, Esaki Aoyama, who was, according to various records, captured by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s army in 1947 when his ship from Okinawa reached the shore of Keelung and was later reportedly murdered on Heping Island (和平島), which was at that time called Sheliao Island (社寮島).

Esaki Aoyama boarded the ship bound for Keelung for a reunion with his wife and son, who were still living in Keelung, after he returned from Vietnam as a draftee soldier.

Keisho Aoyama’s request was rejected by the foundation in 2014, despite his father being recognized as a 228 Incident victim. With the help of the TAHR and Taiwanese lawyers, he filed an administrative lawsuit with the Taipei High Administrative Court in September last year.

The court said in its press release that the Feb. 28 Incident Disposition and Compensation Act (二 二 八事件處理及賠償條例), promulgated in 1995, does not state that compensation should be restricted to Taiwanese.

Taiwan also ratified in 2009 two international human rights covenants, it said, adding that any violation of human rights should be effectively compensated with no discriminatory treatment.

Hsueh Chin-feng (薛欽峰), the lawyer representing Keisho Aoyama, lauded the decision as a “historic ruling,” saying its significance lies in having set a precedent that regardless of nationality, everyone should be equally protected by the law.

“The court stated that the 228 compensation act, a special law, has priority over the State Compensation Law (國家賠償法), a general law,” Hsueh, said referring to the ministry’s invoking of the Article 15 of the state compensation law that says the provisions of the law “shall be applicable to a foreign claimant only to the extent that the people of the Republic of China, according to a treaty, law, or custom of that person’s country, enjoy the same rights in that country.”

The ministry, the competent authority of the supposedly independent 228 Memorial Foundation, had hindered the approval of Keisho Aoyama’s compensation request by suggesting that since Japan has not compensated Taiwanese comfort women and former Taiwanese service personnel, “the principle of reciprocity” maintained in the state compensation law does not apply, TAHR said.

Keisho Aoyama, who appeared at a news conference in Taipei yesterday, said the ruling was “a groundbreaking one upholding justice and human rights,” thanking those who had offered him assistance along the way.

“While the problems of Taiwanese comfort women and Japanese soldiers still exist, the ruling is a great deed in its attempt to overcome this vicious cycle,” he said.

He called on the government and the foundation not to appeal the ruling.

This story has been viewed 19230 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top