A protester holds a flag during a demonstration outside the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taipei against the Singapore meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Photo: Reuters
Yesterday’s meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prompted a protest outside the Presidential Office Building, with activists condemning the meeting and pledging to continue the fight against negotiations over the trade in goods agreement with China.
Photo: EPA
“The Ma-Xi meeting demonstrates that ‘one China with different interpretations’ and the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus’ are shattered, made-up constructions,” Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) said.
The “1992 consensus” is a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted to making up in 2000, referring to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“The Ma-Xi meeting, which adhered to the ‘one China’ principle, has definitively wounded the right of Taiwanese to reject possible futures,” Lai said, adding that civic organizations would fight a prospective trade in goods agreement and mutual establishment of representative offices, which Ma said following the meeting that he would push forward.
Photo: Reuters
Both would be opposed by civic groups as tools used by Beijing to further reunification, Lai said.
The protesters marched through downtown Taipei yesterday afternoon, blocking off lanes of traffic and shutting down roads as they weaved along a 3km route from the Ministry of Economic Affairs building and several other government offices before walking down Ketagalan Boulevard to reach the Presidential Office Building.
Before setting off, protesters shouted a series of slogans protesting the meeting and negotiations, telling Ma to “not come back” because they were willing to “give you [him] to Singapore.”
Preparations for the march were initiated several weeks ago by the Economic Democracy Union, which quickly rebranded and expanded it from a prior focus on trade in goods negotiations after the announcement last week of the Ma-Xi meeting.
Most protesters were from the more than 20 civic organizations that co-sponsored the protest, including Taiwan Association for Human Rights, Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice, Taiwan March and Democracy Tautin.
“We are concerned that the meeting will restrict future administrations [to a ‘one China’ framework], but because they will not sign a formal agreement, it is difficult for the Legislative Yuan to exercise its supervisory powers,” Restoration of Taiwan Social Justice’s research department director Lin Jia-yu (林家宇) said.
Protesters carried flags and banners of their organizations, with Taiwan Solidarity Party, New Power Party, Green Party-Social Democratic Party Alliance and Free Taiwan Party representatives bringing up the rear.
After an initial demonstration in front of the Ministry of Economic Affairs building, they wove their way through traffic to put on a short play in front of the Bureau of Foreign Trade office, with actors representing large corporations wearing masks to symbolize what they say is opaque handling of the trade in goods talks.
While negotiations would mainly benefit the paneling, automotive and petrochemical industries controlled by major companies, many small firms would be placed at a disadvantage and the Ma administration has attempted to “mask” this reality by claiming that the talks would include cosmetic facial masks — helping the small firms comprising that industry, protesters said.
The protesters moved to the Council of Agriculture building to protest a rumored opening up of agricultural markets before making their way to the front of the Presidential Office Building, where prominent figures delivered speeches condemning the meeting and the negotiations.
“We refuse to accept any results of the Ma-Xi meeting,” said Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆), a prominent leader of last year’s Sunflower movement.
The Sunflower movement saw the Legislative Yuan surrounded by thousands of protesters for weeks while Lin and other activists occupied the legislature’s main chamber to protest a service trade agreement with China.
“This reflects the consistent thinking of the Ma administration; it did not have sufficient authorization to negotiate the service trade agreement and the lack of sufficient democratic authorization is the most serious problem with the Ma-Xi meeting,” Lin said, adding that Ma had done everything he could to avoid supervision by the Legislative Yuan.
“There is still no consensus on what relationship we should maintain with China or what we imagine our future should look like,” Lin said. “However, Ma has used his identity as a president who is about to step down to frame and limit future cross-strait interactions.”
Even if the meeting did not produce a written agreement, the negotiations to arrange it should still have been subject to legislative approval, Lin said.
GAINING STEAM: The scheme initially failed to gather much attention, with only 188 cards issued in its first year, but gained popularity amid the COVID-19 pandemic Applications for the Employment Gold Card have increased in the past few years, with the card having been issued to a total of 13,191 people from 101 countries since its introduction in 2018, the National Development Council (NDC) said yesterday. Those who have received the card have included celebrities, such as former NBA star Dwight Howard and Australian-South Korean cheerleader Dahye Lee, the NDC said. The four-in-one Employment Gold Card combines a work permit, resident visa, Alien Resident Certificate (ARC) and re-entry permit. It was first introduced in February 2018 through the Act Governing Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及雇用法),
RESILIENCE: Deepening bilateral cooperation would extend the peace sustained over the 45 years since the Taiwan Relations Act, Greene said Taiwan-US relations are built on deep economic ties and shared values, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene said yesterday, adding that strengthening supply chain security in critical industries, enhancing societal resilience through cooperation and deepening partnerships are key to ensuring peace and stability for Taiwan in the years ahead. Greene made the remarks at the National Security Youth Forum, organized by National Taiwan University’s National Security and Strategy Studies Institution in Taipei. In his address in Mandarin Chinese, Greene said the Taiwan-US relationship is built on deep economic ties and shared interests, and grows stronger through the enduring friendship between
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday said that it would redesign the written portion of the driver’s license exam to make it more rigorous. “We hope that the exam can assess drivers’ understanding of traffic rules, particularly those who take the driver’s license test for the first time. In the past, drivers only needed to cram a book of test questions to pass the written exam,” Minister of Transportation and Communications Chen Shih-kai (陳世凱) told a news conference at the Taoyuan Motor Vehicle Office. “In the future, they would not be able to pass the test unless they study traffic regulations
CAUTION URGED: Xiaohongshu and Douyin — the Chinese version of TikTok — are tools the Chinese government uses for its ‘united front’ propaganda, the MAC said Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) yesterday urged people who use Chinese social media platforms to be cautious of being influenced by Beijing’s “united front” propaganda and undermining Taiwan’s sovereignty. Chiu made the remarks in response to queries about Chinese academic Zhang Weiwei (張維為) saying that as young Taiwanese are fond of interacting on Chinese app Xiaohongshu (小紅書, known as RedNote in English), “after unification with China, it would be easier to govern Taiwan than Hong Kong.” Zhang is professor of international relations at Shanghai’s Fudan University and director of its China Institute. When giving a speech at China’s Wuhan