President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) held a historic meeting in Singapore yesterday, the first time the leaders from both sides of the Taiwan Strait have met since 1949 after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was defeated by the Chinese Communist Party in the Chinese Civil War.
The summit, which began with the two exchanging an extended handshake before going behind closed doors, was trumpeted by Ma and Xi as a milestone in cross-strait relations.
“Today is a special day where leaders from two sides of the Strait meet,” said Xi, who was on a state visit to Singapore to celebrate the 25th anniversary of diplomatic ties between China and the Southeast Asian city-state.
Photo: AP
“Both sides of the Strait are brothers, a family of blood that is thicker than water,” Xi said in his opening remarks of the meeting at the Shangri-La Hotel.
Xi said: “We should let the world know with actions that Chinese on the two sides of the Strait are completely capable of solving our own problem with wisdom,” adding that both sides of the Strait have since 2008 moved toward a path of peaceful development and that people of the two sides have made great efforts to keep the cross-strait situation stable and harmonic over the past seven years.
“I hope that compatriots on both sides of the Strait can jointly uphold the [so-called] ‘1992 consensus,’ consolidate common political foundations, maintain the correct cross-strait development direction and jointly seek great invigoration of the Zhonghua minzu [Chinese ethnic group, 中華民族],” Xi added.
Photo: Taipei Times
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what that means. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2000 admitted that he had made up the term “1992 consensus.”
Ma said that Taiwan would continue to consolidate the “1992 consensus,” maintaining the peaceful “status quo.”
He also called for lowering the state of hostility across the Strait and expanding cross-strait exchanges.
Ma said the “1992 consensus” was subject to the “one China” principle, neglecting to mention the “different interpretations” component that the KMT administration typically stresses.
During the meeting, Ma and Xi addressed each other as “mister,” rather than “president.”
While no agreements were signed and no joint statements were issued following the summit, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) told a post-meeting press conference that both Ma and Xi believe the “1992 consensus” should be upheld, as it “has great significance in promoting the long-term development of cross-strait relations.”
China and Taiwan both belong to “one China,” and dealings between the two sides are not “country-to-country” relations, nor a matter of “one China, one Taiwan,” Zhang cited Xi as saying.
Zhang said China welcomes Taiwan’s participation in the China-initiated Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and its “One Belt, One Road” policy, adding that China is willing to consider and discuss the issue of Taiwan’s international space as long as Taiwan’s participation in regional economic integration and international activities “does not create the perception of ‘one China, one Taiwan,’ or ‘two Chinas.’”
Zhang quoted Xi as saying that “the forces seeking Taiwanese independence are the most real threat to cross-strait peace.”
Zhang said Xi agreed with Ma’s proposal to set up a cross-strait hotline, as it could help improve exchanges and dialogue.
Ma later told a separate press conference that he found Xi “pragmatic, flexible and frank.”
Ma said he hopes such a spirit could be reflected in the future handling of cross-strait matters.
During the meeting, Ma raised the issue of Taiwanese concern over China’s military deployment against Taiwan, he said.
According to Ma, Xi said that “the deployments do not target Taiwan.”
With regard to the “1992 consensus,” in response to reporters’ questions over Taiwan insisting that “one China” means the Republic of China, while Beijing emphasizes its “one China” principle, but intentionally ignores the latter part of the “consensus,” Ma said each side is free to interpret what “one China” means.
“That’s why some have said that [the ‘1992 consensus’] is a masterpiece of ambiguity,” Ma said.
Ma, who attended the closed-door meeting in the company of six other officials, said he found the summit helpful and positive, and reiterated that the purpose of the meeting with Xi was to take a first step toward paving a foundation so that a mechanism of institutionalized meetings between leaders from both sides of the Taiwan Strait could be established
From there, it can allow for the possibility of “super stable” cross-strait relations, he said.
Ma departed Singapore for Taiwan at 9pm on a charter flight after a dinner with Xi.
Later last night, Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) posted a picture on Facebook of him having tea with Ma, adding: “Glad his meeting here went well. Hope this will lead to greater stability and prosperity for the region.”
Additional reporting by CNA
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese