The Taiwan High Court yesterday rejected former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) application for medical parole, saying his case should be taken up in the administrative court.
The High Court added that the decision could be appealed in the Supreme Court.
The judges said Chen’s parole case relates to his treatment at prison facilities controlled by the Ministry of Justice’s Agency of Corrections, so it comes under the jurisdiction of the administrative authority.
Photo: Tsai Shu-yuan, Taipei Times
Therefore, the case should be taken up at the administrative court and be submitted as administrative litigation, the judges said.
Chen filed a motion of objection to the High Court on Thursday, penning the legal complaint himself, following a suggestion by Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) on Monday.
The High Court said that under Article 484 of the Criminal Code, a motion of objection can only lodged against the improper execution of duties by prosecutors. The case was not handled by prosecutors and therefore there was no grounds for a motion of objection, the court said.
On June 10, Chen applied for medical parole with the ministry, but the Agency of Corrections rejected his application, ruling that he did not meet the qualifications for medical parole.
The ruling was carried with the stipulation that the decision could be appealed through the courts.
Chen appealed by filing a motion of objection to the Taipei District Court on Nov. 11.
The District Court rejected the motion in a decision on Nov. 26, saying that the case was not within its jurisdiction.
In a press conference on Monday, Luo openly encouraged Chen to file another application for medical parole, saying it had been six months since his initial medical diagnosis for his current parole bid.
Luo said that for the second application, the Agency of Corrections should consider expanding the panel of experts for the review process to include medical professionals and doctors recommended by Chen’s family.
The latest decision by the High Court again denied Chen’s release from prison to serve the rest of his sentence under medical care at home.
Earlier yesterday, Luo said her suggestion was not an attempt to instruct the judiciary on how to handle Chen’s parole case.
“It is a very odd thing that the media are saying that I was giving instructions. The decision [by the Taipei District Court] was clear, where it said the case was in the wrong jurisdiction, and the decision can be appealed,” she said.
Luo added that she does not know how long the medical parole review process will take, and that the panel has not set a position one way or another.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
RSS