The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday reviewed data from the Ministry of Justice’s Bureau of Investigation (MJIB) concerning allegations that former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) deputy minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) has been acting as a spy. The prosecutors agreed to take charge of an investigation of the matter, despite the same data being turned down by the Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office on Thursday.
Taipei District Prosecutors started investigations into the case yesterday.
According to sources, Chang has been barred from leaving the country and prosecutors will subpoena him for questioning soon.
Photo: Chen Wei-tzum Taipei Times
The difference between the High Prosecutors’ Office prosecuting the case and the District Prosecutors’ Office prosecuting the case is criminal activity related to national security offenses if taken by the former, and meaning the alleged offense would exclude national security offenses if taken by the latter.
Chang has recently been in the spotlight over allegations that he had leaked sensitive information to Chinese officials.
According to sources, Chang had allegedly leaked five pieces of information on cross-strait economics and trade, as well as on the cross-strait trade services agreement.
The Mainland Affairs Council alleged that Chang divulged “confidential” and “secret” information.
Under the National Security Information Protection Act (國家安全機密保護法), restricted information is given three designations: top secret, secret and confidential.
The source also said Chang was suspected of having leaked information about Executive Yuan meetings, which may give a court cause to call Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) to testify.
The prosecutors’ office said it suspected Chang had leaked the information by telling his alleged Chinese contact personally or by passing the contact notes, allowing the Chinese government to learn what Taiwan had brought to the negotiation table and where it would falter.
The bureau’s information showed Chang is suspected of conducting treasonous actions, which would usually place his alleged actions under the jurisdiction of the High Prosecutors’ Office, the District Prosecutors’ Office said.
However, it added that the High Prosecutors’ Office had declined to head the investigation, citing a lack of evidence that the information Chang allegedly leaked was affiliated with national security.
The High Prosecutors’ Office also said that if Chang is charged with dereliction of duty concerning foreign affairs, such charges are only applicable to foreign governments, while the government does not consider relations across the Taiwan Strait to be between nations, based on its “one China” policy.
Separately, lawyer Lin Chun-feng (林俊峰) said that the reason offenses infringing on external security of the nation were placed under the jurisdiction of the High Prosecutors’ Office was that national security matters merited immediate legal attention.
The High Prosecutors’ Office oversees all second trials, which means that once it headed the investigation and oversaw the indictment, the case would go straight through the second and third trials, Lin said.
The nation may have crumbled to the ground by the time the arduous legal processes from initial trial to the third trial are finished with, Lin said.
Additional reporting by CNA
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS