The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a draft bill that would establish a mechanism to monitor agreements between Taiwan and China, but showed no signs of giving in to student activists’ demand that the legislative review of the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement be suspended until the oversight mechanism is institutionalized.
The bill proposed by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) was adopted at a Cabinet meeting yesterday and would allow the Legislative Yuan to revise cross-strait agreements and solicit their renegotiation.
Asked by reporters whether the bill, if enacted, would apply to the pact at the center of the Sunflower movement, MAC Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) gave only vague answers.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
The movement refers to an ongoing student-led siege and occupation of the Legislative Yuan to protest the service trade agreement.
Wang said that if the oversight bill clears the legislature while the cross-strait service trade agreement is still pending review, the pact would be subject to the provisions under the bill regarding the ratification of agreements with China.
Nevertheless, Wang said: “[The bill] would not make any difference to the pact.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The government “respects” the right of the legislature to decide whether to review the draft bill first and then the service trade agreement, or vice versa, Wang said.
“However, from my perspective, the result in each case would be the same,” he added.
Wang declined to elaborate on why the cross-strait service trade pact would be unaffected if lawmakers were given a mandate to revise agreements.
“Let’s talk about this next time,” he said.
The draft bill suggests that a cross-strait agreement would automatically go into effect if the legislature fails to complete its review within three months, which could be extended once for another three months.
Asked whether the service trade agreement would be considered already ratified if the oversight bill is passed by the legislature, given that it has been more than nine months since the agreement was sent to the legislature for review, Wang gave no answer.
Wang said he could not answer the question because the government had agreed to a resolution reached among lawmakers in June last year that the service trade agreement would not become effective without being reviewed and voted on item-by-item.
“If the legislature adopts the draft bill, we still need to figure out how much bearing the June resolution would have on a newly enacted law,” Wang said.
The bill calls for the Executive Yuan to communicate better with the Legislative Yuan and the public on cross-strait negotiations before, during and after such agreements are signed, and to establish a screening mechanism to examine how deals would affect the country from a national security perspective.
Several main points in the oversight mechanism proposed by the Democratic Front Against Cross-Strait Trade in Services Agreement — one of the groups leading the ongoing legislative siege — highlighting the role of the public and the legislature in cross-strait negotiations were not accepted by the government in its version.
These include a demand that the government present a report to the legislature detailing its plan to ink a deal with China and give the legislature 90 days to consider the plan before it decides whether to allow the government to begin negotiations.
Under the civic group’s version, the government is also required to allow civic groups to assess a proposed agreement within 180 days after completion of negotiations and prior to signing the deal, while the legislature is mandated to demand renegotiation when their conclusions differ significantly from those reached by the government.
Wang said that the government highly disapproved of the ideas because the Republic of China Constitution gives the executive branch exclusive power over trade activities with foreign countries, “not the legislative branch,” as opposed to Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution, which he said the civic groups had consulted.
“The ideas run counter to the system of the separation of power in our Constitution,” he said.
The processes the government would be required to abide by would be tantamount to asking the government to “reveal to Mainland China our bottom line,” Wang said.
“In that case, we would lose any negotiation before it begins,” he added.
If the version proposed by the civic group were to pass the legislature, it would make it impossible to sign any cross-strait agreement, Wang said.
Democratic Progressive Party spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said that the Executive Yuan proposal would create “a monitoring mechanism in name only,” under which the legislature would not have the required powers to effectively supervise cross-strait negotiations and agreements.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should
RSS