Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) yesterday censured media outlets for what he called distorted coverage of the movement against the cross-strait service trade pact and rejected comparisons of the dispersal of protesters at the Executive Yuan to Beijing’s crackdown on the 1989 pro-democracy movement in China, saying that police’s use of force at the Taipei complex was “legitimate.”
The parallel between yesterday morning’s removal of the activists occupying the Executive Yuan compound and the Chinese government’s suppression of the Tiananmen Square student protests has been drawn by several media outlets, politicians and commentators.
At an 11am press conference yesterday, Jiang said he “protested certain media outlets” for reportedly saying that the government’s actions constituted a “bloody suppression” of the protesters.
He condemned the publication and repeated broadcast of “images of wounded people,” saying media outlets have “highly distorted the facts” and “misled the public” by producing such coverage.
Jiang also rejected the view expressed by Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) and others that the incident at the Executive Yuan was “Taiwan’s version of Tiananmen Square,” saying that “the majority of people would not agree with that.”
Several dozen demonstrators were injured during the operation to expel them from the Executive Yuan, suffering generally minor injuries such as cuts or abrasions to their heads and faces. Many injuries appeared to be obtained when demonstrators sat or lay down with linked arms to resist the officers’ efforts to move them.
The police are trained to act in as peaceful and rational a manner as possible when required to use force against demonstrators, Jiang said.
“It’s not that the police were mobilized to force any one participating in marches off the streets. On the contrary, it was only the people who burst into the main building of the Executive Yuan to try and paralyze the government [who were targeted],” Jiang said.
Had he not ordered the police to evict the protesters, Jiang said he would have “failed the public” because did not perform his duty as premier well.
Asked by the Taipei Times if police had used excessive force, seeing as the protesters were unarmed and conducting a peaceful sit-in, Jiang said the officers had not been overly forceful.
The premier said he told National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞) before the dispersal that the officers should take care not to hurt anyone.
“What I saw reported in the press is that when the police tried to disperse the protesters, they either lifted them from the ground or patted them on the shoulder to get them to leave. I also saw some protesters leave without being pulled by the police,” he said.
“The police may need to improve certain law enforcement measures, but they never use unnecessary force against civilians,” Jiang said.
He said the exertion of police authority was “legitimate,” considering the site of the demonstrations.
The Executive Yuan is the government’s highest administrative organ and, since the complex houses documents of national interest and serves as a national command center in emergencies, “any attempt to attack, occupy, or paralyze it is impermissible,” Jiang said.
The premier said the government must ensure that the Executive Yuan is operating normally 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
“If there is an emergency — say, North Korea launches a missile or a big earthquake strikes, a command center must be set up immediately at the Executive Yuan,” he added.
CAUTION: Taiwanese should be alert, even if they have just liked or shared posts that would breach Beijing’s national security legislation for Hong Kong, the council said Due to the newly implemented Hong Kong national security legislation, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has drawn up a list of what it described as “high-risk groups,” cautioning them not to travel to Hong Kong. People who support independence for Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang; those who are critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Hong Kong government and the “one country, two systems” concept; and those who donated to or voiced support for the Hong Kong anti-extradition bill movement are urged to refrain from visiting Hong Kong, the council said on its Web site. It released two posts on
NEW HONG KONG LAW: A visit to Beijing-friendly nations or those with weak judicial systems could leave people at risk of deportation to China, a former MAC official said Beijing could request countries with which it has extradition agreements to deport Taiwanese to China to face criminal charges following the implementation of national security legislation for Hong Kong, a former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) official warned yesterday. Some developing countries, and those close to China because of the Belt and Road Initiative, are likely to accommodate Beijing’s requests to extradite Taiwanese to China, said former deputy MAC minister Chen Ming-chi (陳明祺), who served from July 2, 2018, until May 20, and then returned to his former post as an assistant professor of sociology at National Tsing Hua University. While Taiwanese
MORAL COURAGE: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the global community to face China’s intention to subdue Taiwan and reject such irrational requests The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday strongly condemned the Chinese government for meddling with US officials’ interactions with Taiwan after FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed China’s efforts to discourage US officials from visiting Taiwan. The greatest long-term threat to the US’ information security and intellectual property, as well as its economic vitality, is China’s counterintelligence and economic espionage operations, Wray told a video event at the Hudson Institute in Washington. Beijing is engaged in a highly sophisticated and maligning foreign influence campaign, with methods that include bribery, blackmail and covert deals, he said. Giving an example, Wray said that when a US official
IN THE PIPELINE: The Ministry of National Defense said the sale, expected to take effect in one month, would be the seventh arms sale under the Trump administration The government yesterday thanked the US for approving the possible sale of a US$620 million missile repair and recertification package to Taiwan. The US Department of State has approved the sale of a package to recertify Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missiles to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) in Washington for an estimated US$620 million, the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release on Thursday. The agency has delivered the required certification to the US Congress, notifying it of the possible sale, it added. The TECRO had requested to buy an upgrade package that would support an operational