Hundreds of academics and members of the public yesterday threw their weight behind a petition urging the Ministry of Education to revoke its recent decision to revise the national high-school curriculum, which pro-localization groups describe as an attempt to “brainwash” the nation’s youth.
The petition was launched at 11pm on Friday by the Alliance of Youth Defending Taiwanese History (捍衛台灣文史青年組合), a civic organization composed of “professors and students proficient in the nation’s history.”
At press time yesterday, the petition had received 427 signatures.
It was initiated in the wake of the ministry’s approval on Monday of a new curriculum on Chinese literature and social sciences that it said contained “slight adjustments” based on the Constitution.
The changes would see the era of Tokyo’s rule referred to as the “Japanese colonial period” and China as “Mainland China” in textbooks. Critics say the ministry is seeking to “de-Taiwanize” high-school textbooks and make them more “China-oriented.”
“Taiwanese history and culture had witnessed the rule of the Dutch, the Spanish, the Ming Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty, the Japanese and the Republic of China [ROC]... However, only after the removal of Article 100 of the Criminal Code in 1992 did Taiwanese break free of the shackles of an authoritarian educational system and gain a new perspective on the island,” the alliance said in its petition statement.
The article had allowed charges of sedition to be filed against those suspected of plotting to overthrow the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime.
The statement said it was the relentless effort of a group of academics since the 1990s that helped contribute to the inclusion of “various kinds of academic research on the island” into the national education curriculum and schools, and put an end to an era dominated by authoritarian leadership when the sole purpose of education was to “serve a specific ideology.”
However, their effort has been nullified by the ministry’s apparent attempt to allow a “dark political force” to influence the recent changes in the high-school history curriculum under the pretext of decolonization, the statement said.
“Its real agenda is to bring back an authoritarian teaching style ... and reinvigorate totalitarian thinking by distorting the minds of young Taiwanese through education,” it added.
The statement also questioned the Ministry of Culture’s controversial appointment of Weng Chih-tsung (翁誌聰), who used to be a specialist at the ministry’s Bureau of Audiovisual and Music Industry Development, on Jan. 17 as the new director of the National Museum of Taiwan Literature, the most significant organization responsible for research on Taiwanese literature.
“The appointment of Weng, who specializes almost exclusively in Chinese literature, clearly runs counter to the founding principle of the museum to facilitate the development of contemporary, classic and mother tongue literatures while safeguarding Taiwan’s diversified and multilingual culture,” the statement said.
Weng’s designation has once again placed the teaching of Taiwanese history and literature under the threat of an authoritarian party-state and China-centric mindset, it added.
Among other demands, the statement also called on the ministry to make public a complete list of the members of its curriculum adjustment task force and all documents concerning its meetings; to clearly explain the member selection mechanism for the task force and subject it to public scrutiny; and to appoint someone with more credibility and experience in the research, creation and development of Taiwanese literature to the museum.
Separately, a group of teachers of civics and society from various high schools said they plan to take a series of protest actions starting next week to demand that the ministry hold off on implementing the new curriculum.
Chou Wei-tung (周威同), a teacher of civics and society at National Taitung Girls’ Senior High School, told the Chinese-language Liberty Times, (the Taipei Times’ sister paper), that they are seeking to communicate with the ministry face to face.
The protests against the national education curriculum in Hong Kong last year was driven by students, and Taiwan is facing a similar situation, with the state attempting to monopolize education, Chou said.
He said the group has decided to take action to let the public’s voice be heard.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan
EFFICIENCY: The rules for Philippine arrivals were revised after 17.6% of arrivals with symptoms tested positive, compared with 0.7% of those with no symptoms Starting today, Chinese spouses who hold a reunion permit can apply to enter Taiwan and travelers without symptoms from the Philippines do not need to be tested for COVID-19 upon arrival, but are to be tested after a 14-day quarantine, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said yesterday. Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the center, said that from today, Chinese who are married to a Taiwanese citizen and hold a reunion permit can apply to the National Immigration Agency for entry into Taiwan. Chinese who are married to a foreign national and hold an accompanied reunion permit
CONSOLIDATION? Taiwan Thinktank deputy executive-general Doong Sy-chi said Beijing’s intimidation tactics are further alienating those who identify as Chinese Only 2 percent of respondents to a poll on constitutional amendments and national identity identified as Chinese, while 62.6 percent identified as Taiwanese, the Taiwan Thinktank said yesterday. Legislators have proposed amendments to the Additional Articles of the Constitution (憲法增修條文), which would change the definition of the nation’s territory, remove the Taiwan Provincial Government as an entity, prioritize the use of “Taiwan” for national groups at international events, and remove restrictions on defining the national emblem, national flag and national anthem. The poll showed that 80.5 percent of respondents agreed that the nation should participate as “Taiwan” at events organized by world
MISTAKE: The Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy is not a UN body, and the government is committed to protecting the nation’s name, Joseph Wu said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday condemned the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy for listing Taiwanese cities as belonging to China on its Web site, and asked that it correct the error. The organization was inaugurated in Brussels in 2016 as a global coalition of mayors committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Six Taiwanese cities at the time joined the coalition as cities in “Taiwan,” the ministry said. However, officials from the Kaohsiung City Government — one of the organization’s members — last week noticed that the city was now listed on the organization’s Web site as a
BALANCED DEVELOPMENT: TSMC chairman Mark Liu said the firm is committed to local investment: a third in the north, a third in the center, a third in the south Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, yesterday said that, based on its strategy of balancing capacity, it plans to make northern Taiwan its manufacturing hub for advanced technologies that go beyond 2 nanometers. “As the company is committed to investing in Taiwan, we try to deploy one-third [of our total production capacity] in the north and have one-third each in the center and south” of the nation, TSMC chairman Mark Liu (劉德音) told reporters on the sidelines of Semicon Taiwan’s Master Forum in Taipei. TSMC last year reached its goal of deploying capacity equally across those parts