Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) told lawmakers yesterday that he has never heard of the interpretation of the US’ “one China policy” that Washington does not recognize Taiwan as part of China.
At a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, King was asked by Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Mark Chen (陳唐山) to explain the difference between Beijing’s “one China” policy and the US’ “one China” policy.
Whenever the US mentions its relations with China, it always emphasizes that the three communiques are essential elements it must abide by, aside from its “one China policy,” Chen said.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Chen asked King how the “one China” policy the US has pursued since 1972, as reflected in the Shanghai Communique, the Joint Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the US and China and the 817 communique, differs from China’s “one China” policy.
King, who has been representative to the US since December 2012, appeared to struggle to answer the question.
“There is a difference in the choice of words between ‘recognize’ and ‘acknowledge’ in English. You know better than I do,” King said, referring to the US’ use of the term “acknowledge” rather than “recognize” in response to Beijing’s position that “there is but one China, and Taiwan is part of China.”
He added that Taiwan wished that the US would mention the “six assurances,” made by former US president Ronald Reagan in 1982, more often, because one of the “six assurances” is of great importance: that the US would not alter its position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan.
King then asked Chen to be more specific about his question.
Chen told King that his understanding of the difference is that “the US never recognizes Taiwan as part of China at all.”
Chen said the understanding is based on what he has learned from his “long-term communications with the US.”
In response, King said: “It’s the first time I have heard of this.”
Chen told King that he should gain a better understanding of the issue.
When contacted by the Taipei Times by telephone after the exchange, Chen said he took up the issue with King to “remind” him that as the nation’s representative to the US, “he should have known and understood the subtleties.”
Chen said that the US has always clarified China’s claim that the US recognized its contention that Taiwan is part of China, as public records have shown.
“If the US agreed to China’s ‘one China’ policy, it wouldn’t bother mentioning the three communiques,” Chen said.
The issue of what position the US has on Taiwan’s intent to join the nascent Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was at center of discussion at the committee meeting yesterday.
King downplayed the concern raised by several lawmakers across party lines that the US seems to be less enthusiastic about supporting Taiwan’s membership in the TPP than toward Japan and South Korea.
“The responses we have received from the US’ public and private sectors have been positive,” he said. “We need to get ourselves ready for trade liberalization and get rid of protectionist measures and we will be able to join the TPP when the time is appropriate.”
Pressed to give a timetable, King said he would work hard to achieve the objective recently suggested by former premier Sean Chen (陳?), that Taiwan enter into TPP negotiations next year.
King declined to elaborate what trade irritants exist between Taiwan and the US that some lawmakers said have made the latter hesitant to support Taiwan’s inclusion in the TPP negotiations, citing confidentiality.
Asked to assess if China is an obstacle to Taiwan’s TPP bid, King said he was “not 100 percent sure,” but he has never heard from US officials that China is a factor in the decision.
Regarding arms sales, King said diesel-electric submarines “top the list of Taiwan’s most-wanted weapons from the US.”
Taiwan for years has requested eight diesel-electric submarines from the US to counter China’s increasingly advanced naval capabilities, but the US has not produced diesel-electric submarines domestically since the 1950s.
Asked whether there are talks on the possibility of the US transferring its production technologies to enable Taiwan to produce the submarines, King said he could not comment.
Another issue of concern to lawmakers was the quality of US weapons.
Six AH-64E Apache helicopters, recently delivered to Taiwan as a first batch, have been grounded for safety checks due to a malfunction in a helicopter of the same model used by the US Army.
Meanwhile, a malfunction was also found in the flight control system on board two of the 12 P-3C marine patrol aircraft.
DPP Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩) said she suspected the US was pressed by China to provide Taiwan with faulty weapons.
Records showed that Taiwan failed to get weapons as advanced weapons those obtained from the US by Japan, Australia, Japan, Indonesia and India at the same price, signaling that Taiwan’s strategic position was in decline, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Cheng-hsiang (陳鎮湘) said.
King promised to convey the concerns to the US.
With regard to the wish of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at this year’s APEC summit in Beijing, King said he did not know what opinions the US has on the issue because it was never brought up.
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
IMPORTANT BACKER: China seeks to expel US influence from the Indo-Pacific region and supplant Washington as the global leader, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said China is preparing for war to seize Taiwan, Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said in Washington on Friday, warning that Taiwan’s fall would trigger a regional “domino effect” endangering US security. In a speech titled “Maintaining the Peaceful and Stable Status Quo Across the Taiwan Strait is in Line with the Shared Interests of Taiwan and the United States,” Chiu said Taiwan’s strategic importance is “closely tied” to US interests. Geopolitically, Taiwan sits in a “core position” in the first island chain — an arc stretching from Japan, through Taiwan and the Philippines, to Borneo, which is shared by
RSS