Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) yesterday accused the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division (SID) of wiretapping the Legislative Yuan.
The legislature’s central exchange number, along with Ker’s cellphone number, were found on lists of tapped telephone lines.
All inbound and outbound telephone calls to the Legislative Yuan have been wiretapped, Ker said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“The SID has abused its authority and wiretapped so many people... [the SID] knew what I said to [DPP Chairman] Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), [former DPP chairperson] Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and [People First Party Chairman] James Soong (宋楚瑜). No wonder we lost the presidential election in 2012,” Ker said.
He accused the SID of wiretapping his telephone conversations for more than five years, and said that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had resorted to using secret agents to help govern the country.
Serious flaws have already been found in wiretap approvals used for Ker that were all listed under a case involving former Tainan County Council speaker Wu Chien-pao (吳健保), who, according to Ker, was not connected to him or the legislature.
The approvals showed that Ker’s telephone was tapped between May 16 and Sept. 9 this year during an investigation of his possible role in improper lobbying, which also involved Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
The SID and Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘)have attracted condemnation across party lines for the wiretapping.
DPP lawmaker Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said Ker’s telephones had been tapped for four extra days because the SID wrapped up investigation of the case on Sept. 5.
The SID has not only placed telephone numbers of unrelated cases under a single wiretapping ticket, but has also unilaterally extended wiretapping periods, DPP legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said.
The approval showed that the legislature’s central exchange number was wiretapped for around a month, but a letter notifying Ker of the end of the wiretap, as required by law, showed the exchange was tapped for nearly four months.
At a press conference last night, Huang apologized for “causing social disturbance” with wiretapping, but denied it had been intentional.
The SID was neither aware that the telephone number was the Legislative Yuan’s central exchange number nor did it understand that it was wiretapping the legislature at the time, Huang said.
Huang added that the agency authorized by the SID to carry out the wiretaps was unable to monitor a central exchange number, which transferred inbound calls to designated offices or individuals.
“All those wiretap records were blank as we failed to get any conversation from the tape,” Huang said.
The SID did not mention the details in a press conference called yesterday morning because the officials did not have the correct information, he said.
Huang said when the SID was investigating a case involving former Taiwan High Court judges Chen Jun-ho (陳榮和), the division came across a person suspected of asking Ker to help a prisoner be released on parole, and at the same time found funds entering Ker’s bank accounts. The SID suspected he was taking bribes and applied to the Taipei District Court to wiretap four telephones including that said to be of the legislature’s central exchange.
However, Huang insisted that the number was personal, not the legislature’s central exchange number. He declined to reveal the identity of the number’s user.
Wang confirmed yesterday that the telephone number is one of seven landlines at the Legislative Yuan and has been in use since August 2006.
According to the legislature’s secretariat, due to the large number of calls the legislature has to process, it had sought to cut down on expenses by cooperating with Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd to bind calls to the number 0972-630-235 as well as the landline number (02)2358-5858.
The Legislative Yuan’s Dean of General Affairs Tsai Wei-min (蔡衛民) said the number is a low-cost Legislative Yuan landline, which cannot be used as personal number.
The legislature signed a contract with Chunghua Telecom in 2006 to apply for seven low-cost telephone numbers that allowed unlimited calls among 60 numbers across the legislature, Tsai said.
He said that 0972-630-235 is used in the Chunghsin Building, where lawmakers’ offices are located.
When using low-cost lines to make calls, the standard number 2358-5858 is shown as the caller ID, he said, adding that the seven numbers would not be mistaken as personal phone numbers.
According to telecommunication experts, if a wiretap was set on the main switchboard, it would be easy to listen to any extensions connected to that switch board.
There are a great number of extensions to any switchboard in a large company, and in the event that one company has 300 extensions it could apply for five landlines to avoid calls clogging up its systems, although the landlines would all be linked to one number, they added.
This would make it seem like the same number to callers, but the call is just a matter of rerouting to the switchboard and jumping between the five available lines to find the first unoccupied call slot, experts said, adding that if the switchboard itself was wiretapped, calls on all five lines could be listened to.
Conversations could be recorded and used later, the experts said.
It would not be a technical problem to have any extension within the Legislative Yuan wiretapped, they said.
Technological developments also enabled wiretaps to bypass the action of sending in an operative to the site so taps could be set up remotely from a computer.
Those familiar with wiretapping procedures said that while wiretapping a switchboard was technically feasible, the number of call records agents would have to go through would be like searching for a needle in a haystack. It would also be difficult to determine who was speaking to who when bugging a switchboard.
Bugging a switchboard might be overkill and violate the principle of proportionality, one expert said, adding that the courts would not authorize a wiretap of an entire switchboard unless it was a large case or if there was already sufficient evidence gathered.
Yesterday morning, the SID denied it has wiretap the legislature’s switchboard.
“We absolutely do not wiretap a legislature’s switchboard,” SID spokesman Yang Jung-tsung (楊榮宗) told a press conference.
Additional reporting by Liu Li-jen, Huang Tun-yen, Lin Chun-hung
The nation’s fastest supercomputer, Nano 4 (晶創26), is scheduled to be launched in the third quarter, and would be used to train large language models in finance and national defense sectors, the National Center for High-Performance Computing (NCHC) said. The supercomputer, which would operate at about 86.05 petaflops, is being tested at a new cloud computing center in the Southern Taiwan Science Park in Tainan. The exterior of the server cabinet features chip circuitry patterns overlaid with a map of Taiwan, highlighting the nation’s central position in the semiconductor industry. The center also houses Taiwania 2, Taiwania 3, Forerunner 1 and
FIRST TRIAL: Ko’s lawyers sought reduced bail and other concessions, as did other defendants, but the bail judge denied their requests, citing the severity of the sentences Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was yesterday sentenced to 17 years in prison and had his civil rights suspended for six years over corruption, embezzlement and other charges. Taipei prosecutors in December last year asked the Taipei District Court for a combined 28-year, six-month sentence for the four cases against Ko, who founded the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The cases were linked to the Core Pacific City (京華城購物中心) redevelopment project and the mismanagement of political donations. Other defendants convicted on separate charges included Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Angela Ying (應曉薇), who was handed a 15-year, six-month sentence; Core Pacific
J-6 REMODEL: The converted drones are part of Beijing’s expanding mix of airpower weapons, including bombers with stand-off missiles and UAV swarms, the report said China has stationed obsolete supersonic fighters converted to attack drones at six air bases close to the Taiwan Strait, a report published this month by the Arlington, Virginia-based Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies said. Satellite imagery of the airfields from the institute’s “China Airpower Tracker” shows what appear to be lines of stubby, swept-winged aircraft matching the shape of J-6 fighters that first flew with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force in the 1960s. Since their conversion to drones, the aircraft have been identified at five bases in China’s Fujian Province and one in Guangdong Province, the report said. J.
China used fake LinkedIn profiles to harvest sensitive data from NATO and EU institutions by soliciting information from staff, a European security source said on Friday. The operation, allegedly orchestrated by the Chinese Ministry of State Security, targeted dozens of employees at the military alliance or EU organizations through fictitious accounts, the source said, confirming reports in French and Belgian media. Posing as recruiters on the online professional networking platform, Chinese spies would initially request paid reports before later soliciting non-public or even classified information. One particularly active fake profile used the name “Kevin Zhang,” claiming to be the head
RSS