The government is making preparations for Taiwan and China to establish representative offices on each side of the Taiwan Strait, a goal set to be completed by the end of the year, Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) told a press conference yesterday.
Taipei and Beijing recently decided to enter formal talks on the issue after two informal meetings had been held, Chang told a press conference following a Cabinet meeting.
At the meeting, the Cabinet approved a draft bill governing the establishment of an office in Taiwan by the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS), the counterpart of Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF).
Both semi-official agencies are entrusted by their respective governments with handling cross-strait affairs.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) instructed Cabinet members to discuss concerns lawmakers may have with the project to get the bill passed by the legislature before the current session ends in the middle of the year, Executive Yuan spokesperson Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said.
The representative offices are to be established by the SEF and ARATS and designated as branches of those institutions.
Under the bill, the ARATS branches in Taiwan and staff at the offices would be granted certain special rights for them to carry out their duties without legal interference.
Included in the rules are that no one would be allowed to enter the branches without the permission of those offices; their property and assets would be immune from search, confiscation or expropriation; and documents and archives would be inviolable.
The offices would not fall under Taiwan’s jurisdiction in civil, criminal or administrative matters, unless the circumstances indicate otherwise, such as following the abandonment of such rights, employees are defendants in a counter-claim filed in an original case, or are involved in business litigation or lawsuits related to real estate, the bill says.
The bill stipulates that Chinese staff at the ARATS offices in Taiwan would enjoy immunity from Taiwan’s jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters in the exercise of their functions, and would have certain tax exemptions and other privileges to be decided at the discretion of the Cabinet.
Chang said that provisions under the draft bill were the principles by which the government would base the negotiations with China over the establishment of SEF branches in China as both sides need to “sustain an equal and reciprocal relationship.”
An ARATS branch in Taiwan would never be like the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in Hong Kong, an organ of the Central People’s Government of China, or Xinhua news agency’s branch in Hong Kong, the successor of the Liaison Office before Hong Kong was returned to Chinese rule, Chang said.
The cross-strait relationship and the relationship between Hong Kong and China before and after 1997 are not comparable, Chang said.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s