Fri, Jul 06, 2012 page1

• Fukushima a ‘man-made disaster’

  FAULT LINE: An inquiry found the Fukushima Dai-ichi meltdown was a preventable ‘man-made’ disaster. It condemned the ‘ignorance and arrogance’ of those in charge

  • Reuters, TOKYO
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear crisis was a preventable disaster resulting from “collusion” among the government, regulators and the plant operator, an expert panel said yesterday, wrapping up an inquiry into the worst nuclear accident in 25 years.

  Damage from the huge earthquake on March 11 last year, and not just the ensuing tsunami, could not be ruled out as a cause of the accident, the panel added, a finding that could have serious implications as Japan seeks to bring idled reactors back on line.

  The panel also criticized the response of plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO), regulators and then-Japanese prime minister Naoto Kan, who quit last year after criticism of his handling of a natural disaster that developed into a man-made crisis.

  “The ... Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident was the result of collusion between the government, the regulators and Tepco, and the lack of governance by said parties,” the panel said in an English summary of a 641-page report.

  Regulators, it said, had been reluctant to adopt global safety standards that could have helped prevent the disaster in which reactors melted down, spewing radiation and forcing about 150,000 people from their homes, many of whom will never return.

  “Across the board, the Commission found ignorance and arrogance unforgivable for anyone or any organisation that deals with nuclear power. We found a disregard for global trends and a disregard for public safety,” the panel said.

  The panel’s finding that seismic damage may well have played a role could affect the restart of reactors that were taken offline, mostly for maintenance and safety checks, in the months since Fukushima.

  “We have proved that it cannot be said that there would have been no crisis without the tsunami,” Katsuhiko Ishibashi, a seismologist and panel member, said in the report.

  Experts have said that an active fault may lie under Kansai Electric Power Co’s Ohi plant in western Japan, whose No. 3 unit began supplying electricity to the grid early yesterday. Ohi’s No. 4 unit will come on line later this month after the government approved the restarts to avoid a power shortage.

  “This means that all of Japan’s reactors are vulnerable and require retro-fitting, calling into question the hasty decision of the [Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko] Noda Cabinet to restart reactors before getting the lessons of Fukushima,” said Jeffrey Kingston, Asia studies director at Temple University in Tokyo.

  The report by the experts — one of three panels looking into the Fukushima Dai-ichi disaster — follows a six-month investigation involving more than 900 hours of hearings and interviews with more than 1,100 people, the first such inquiry of its kind.

  Many of the shocking details of the disaster, including TEPCO’s failure to prepare for a big tsunami and a chaotic response by the utility and government, have already been made public.

  Critics have long argued that cosy ties among utilities, nuclear regulators and lawmakers were key reasons for the crisis.

  In an effort to repair tattered public trust, the government will in a few months establish a more independent nuclear watchdog that will then draft new safety rules.

  The report pointed to numerous missed opportunities to take steps to prevent the disaster, citing lobbying by the nuclear power companies, as well as a “safety myth” mindset that permeated the industry and the regulatory regime as among the reasons for the failure to be prepared.

  “As a result of inadequate oversight, the SA [Severe Accident] countermeasures implemented in Japan were practically ineffective compared to the countermeasures in place abroad, and actions were significantly delayed as a result,” it said.

  TEPCO came under heavy criticism in the report, partly for putting cost-cutting steps ahead of safety as nuclear power became less profitable over the years.

  “While giving lip service to a policy of ‘safety first,’ in actuality, safety suffered at the expense of other management priorities,” the team said.

  In a report on its internal investigation issued last month, TEPCO denied responsibility, saying the big “unforeseen” tsunami was to blame.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Investors diversify from TSMC to other winners of AI boom

  • 2

    HSR malfunction causes delays, reduced service

  • 3

    Japan ‘mystery illness’ not new: CDC

  • 4

    Taiwan eyes 100,000 drones a month

  • 5

    Taiwan, China coast guards argue in South China Sea