The Taiwan High Court yesterday handed a not guilty verdict to a group of pan-blue lawmakers who were charged with violating the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) in March 2004 and accused of leading supporters in a violent rampage outside the Central Election Commission (CEC).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華), former KMT legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅) and former People First Party (PFP) legislator Feng Ting-kuo (馮定國) were found not guilty, while the charges against late PFP legislator Lin Huei-kwung (林惠官) were dropped after he passed away in August 2009.
Lee, Chiu, Feng and Lin — all lawmakers at the time — mobilized a crowd and staged a protest outside the CEC building on March 26, 2004, prior to the commission’s declaration of the result of the 2004 presidential election, when then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and then-vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won a second term.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Then-KMT presidential candidate Lien Chan (連戰) lost the race to Chen by a razor-thin margin of fewer than 30,000 votes — or 0.228 percent of the vote.
The four insisted there were controversies left over from the 2004 presidential election and that Chen and Lu should not have been officially declared the winners of their re-election bid.
After the four were invited into the building, a crowd attacked the CEC building, throwing eggs and breaking glass doors and windows, despite police three times asking them to leave the premises and disperse.
The four were prosecuted for violating the Assembly and Parade Act and were sentenced to three months in jail by the Taipei District Court.
Meanwhile, Chiu, Feng and Lin received an additional sentence of 25 days in detention for insulting a government office.
When the case was appealed to the Taiwan High Court, Lee, Chiu and Feng all denied the charges, saying the did not mobilize the crowd and they were not there when police requested that the crowd disperse and so could not be considered responsible.
The court yesterday said that there was no evidence that the four were the leaders of the demonstration and that they were not present when the conflict occurred, hence Lee, Chiu and Feng were declared not guilty.
Responding to the verdict, Lee said through his office aide that the prosecution was a politically motivated one and he was happy that the eight-year legal battle had ended in a victory.
Court verdicts relating to recent violations of the Assembly and Parade Act:
1. In 2008, former Taiwan Association for Human Rights chairman Lin Chia-fan (林佳範) was indicted for leading a demonstration in front of the Legislative Yuan calling for amendments to the Assembly and Parade Act during the Wild Strawberries Student Movement, when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan.
Lin was acquitted of violating the Assembly and Parade Act on Feb. 23.
2. In 2006, charges were filed against red-shirt campaign leader Shih Ming-teh (施明德) and 15 others for violation of the Act after they launched a campaign which sought to force then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) from office. Although the Taipei District Court ruled that Shih and the others were not guilty, the prosecution appealed to the High Court. Shih and the 15 other defendants were found not guilty by the High Court on April 8, 2010.
3. In May 2007, then-People First Party Legislator Fu Kun-chi led a protest in front of the Environmental Protection Administration, calling for construction of the Suao-Hualien Freeway. When Fu led protesters to the Control Yuan on the way to submit his petition to the Executive Yuan, the police said the assembly had gone beyond the geographical bounds of the original application, indicating that the area was beyond the legal scope for assembly.
The Taipei District Court sentenced Fu to 55 days in jail on the grounds that “the assembly did not disband when ordered to do so by the authorities, and disregarded such instructions despite numerous warnings.”
In November 2008, the High Court denied Fu’s appeal and that ruling was final.
4. Former Green Party chairman Kao Cheng-yan (高成炎) staged a protest at the intersection of Zhongshan S Road and Renai Road in Taipei City in April 1994, criticizing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for tearing down its central party headquarters and erecting a new building. During his sit-in, Kao called a radio station and asked for the assistance of taxi drivers. Former Taiwan Tribune deputy editor-in-chief Chang Chin-tse (張金策) and Lin Cheng-Hsiu (林正修) went with the taxi driver supporters to Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and were suspected of vandalizing public property inside the hall. Kao was given a final sentence of three months in jail or a fine. He refused to pay the fine and was subsequently jailed.
5. In January 2010, National Taiwan University professor Tsay Ting-kuei (蔡丁貴), who at the time had already been subjected to 28 fines totaling NT$840,000 for violating the Act, was charged with preventing public servants from carrying out their duties after being arrested by police when protesting in front of the Presidential Office.
In the first trial, Tsay was found not guilty because of insufficient evidence, but after the High Court re-examined a CD containing new evidence, it determined that he had clearly obstructed civil servants from doing their duty and handed down a final sentence of 30 days in prison or a NT$30,000 fine.
Information compiled by staff reporter Lin Ching-chuan
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff Writer
CHAOS: Iranians took to the streets playing celebratory music after reports of Khamenei’s death on Saturday, while mourners also gathered in Tehran yesterday Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in a major attack on Iran launched by Israel and the US, throwing the future of the Islamic republic into doubt and raising the risk of regional instability. Iranian state television and the state-run IRNA news agency announced the 86-year-old’s death early yesterday. US President Donald Trump said it gave Iranians their “greatest chance” to “take back” their country. The announcements came after a joint US and Israeli aerial bombardment that targeted Iranian military and governmental sites. Trump said the “heavy and pinpoint bombing” would continue through the week or as long
TRUST: The KMT said it respected the US’ timing and considerations, and hoped it would continue to honor its commitments to helping Taiwan bolster its defenses and deterrence US President Donald Trump is delaying a multibillion-dollar arms sale to Taiwan to ensure his visit to Beijing is successful, a New York Times report said. The weapons sales package has stalled in the US Department of State, the report said, citing US officials it did not identify. The White House has told agencies not to push forward ahead of Trump’s meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), it said. The two last month held a phone call to discuss trade and geopolitical flashpoints ahead of the summit. Xi raised the Taiwan issue and urged the US to handle arms sales to
State-run CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC, 台灣中油) yesterday said that it had confirmed on Saturday night with its liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil suppliers that shipments are proceeding as scheduled and that domestic supplies remain unaffected. The CPC yesterday announced the gasoline and diesel prices will rise by NT$0.2 and NT$0.4 per liter, respectively, starting Monday, citing Middle East tensions and blizzards in the eastern United States. CPC also iterated it has been reducing the proportion of crude oil imports from the Middle East and diversifying its supply sources in the past few years in response to geopolitical risks, expanding
Pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai’s (黎智英) fraud conviction and prison sentence were yesterday overturned by a Hong Kong court, in a surprise legal decision that comes soon after Lai was jailed for 20 years on a separate national security charge. Judges Jeremy Poon (潘兆初), Anthea Pang (彭寶琴) and Derek Pang (彭偉昌) said in the judgement that they allowed the appeal from Lai, and another defendant in the case, to proceed, as a lower court judge had “erred.” “The Court of Appeal gave them leave to appeal against their conviction, allowed their appeals, quashed the convictions and set aside the sentences,” the judges