Academics yesterday hit back at Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai’s (蔡正元) threat to cut the budget of Academia Sinica’s Institutum Jurisprudentiae, after researchers spoke out against Want Want China Times Group’s (旺旺中時集團) plan to purchase a cable services network.
Want Want’s plan to acquire the cable TV services owned by China Network Systems (CNS, 中嘉網路), a NT$76 billion (US$2.57 billion) merger that could affect a quarter of television-owning households nationwide, has sparked concern among the public, rights activists and academics who fear that it could lead to a media monopoly, which would compromise freedoms of the press and of expression.
Upset that many Academia Sinica researchers — especially those from the Institutum Jurisprudentiae — have opposed the merger, Tsai said at the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee meeting last week that he would propose cutting the budget for the institute, adding that academics should not be involved in a “purely commercial merger” and that they were politically motivated.
Photo: Chien Jung-feng, Taipei Times
Academics yesterday said that Tsai’s threat was a breach of freedom of expression.
“It’s a positive thing for academics to be concerned about public issues and make comments about them,” Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology research fellow Lin Thung-hong (林宗弘) told a news conference at the Legislative Yuan. “It’s regrettable that politicians are trying to curb academics’ freedom to speak on public issues.”
Lin added that if big businesses and politicians worked together to restrict academics’ freedom of speech through judicial or legislative means, “it would spark a huge crisis in Taiwan.”
Chen Kui-hsien (陳貴賢), a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, accused “some politicians” of “trying to make academics purely academic through threats to cut budgets.”
“We have to let the politician know that what he is doing is beyond the power of a legislator,” Chen said. “We need more academics to play a professional and active role in public affairs.”
Wu Rwei-ren (吳叡人), a member of Academia Sinica’s Liberty Society, called on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who doubles as the KMT chairman, to clearly speak out against curbing freedom of expression and to stop KMT lawmakers such as Tsai from threatening academics.
Asked about the academics’ protest, Tsai said that even if Want Want China Times Group is indeed pro-China, there is no law stipulating that a pro-China group could not engage in the media business.
Tsai said he was not taking the side of Want Want China Times Group. He said he was merely confining the discussion to the matter at hand and that it was the people at the Academia Sinica who were not clear what the issues are.
The Chinese-language China Times, a subsidiary of Want Want China Times Group, ran an opinion piece yesterday saying it was within a lawmaker’s authority to cut a government agency’s budget, but that it would also need to go through a collegiate system in the legislature.
It added that academics clamor for freedom of expression and yet are oblivious to others’ rights, with their launching of a petition to exert pressure on Tsai.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiao-kuang
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS