The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday outlined six primary reasons for its loss in the presidential election last month and concluded that the party’s support rate took a dramatic hit in the final two weeks of the campaign.
However, the DPP decided to put on hold a thorough discussion of the future direction of its China policy, arguably the most important factor behind its loss, opting to focus on the “technical” side of the election in a Central Standing Committee meeting when outgoing DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) submitted a draft election review to the party.
“The review concluded that the following reasons contributed to our loss, including voters’ doubts about the DPP as a ruling party, a collaborated effort of the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] and the Chinese Communist Party to use the cross-strait economy as a scare tactic and the KMT’s abuse of its administrative resources as campaign tools,” DPP spokesperson Lin Yu-chang (林右昌) told reporters after the three-hour meeting.
Also, many DPP supporters could not return to their hometowns to vote because the election was held one week before the Lunar New Year holiday, Lin said.
The last two reasons were a lower-than-expected turnout rate and tactical voting, which saw pan-blue voters choosing to “abandon” the People First Party’s (PFP) presidential candidate, Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), and vote for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT instead, Lin said.
The committee agreed that the KMT had run a more “technically successful” campaign in terms of crisis management and campaign tactics, as well as communications, Lin added.
The review contained two parts — an analysis of the change of the DPP’s support rate throughout the entire campaign and opinion polls conducted after the election, as well as an analysis of the DPP’s campaign strategy and policy.
The review found that Tsai had pulled ahead of Ma at least four times during the final six months of the campaign and that she still enjoyed an advantage as late as the end of December last year, before the situation took a dramatic turn.
Results of the DPP’s final internal poll showed that Tsai trailed Ma by 4 percent, the party’s polling center director Chen Chun-lin (陳俊麟) said.
Tsai lost to Ma by about 800,000 votes, or about 6 percent. She pledged to deliver a complete election report that would examine the campaign using a scientific approach, rather than assumptions.
The review also found that pan-blue supporters’ willingness to vote had gone up by 15 percent between November and Jan. 14, and that Tsai lost her edge among swing voters in a two-month period from early November onwards, Chen said.
In addition, statistics showed voter turnout in traditional KMT strongholds enjoyed larger increases of about 5 percent or 6 percent over those in the DPP-dominated regions.
The same phenomenon happened in urban areas, such as Taoyuan, New Taipei City (新北市) and Taipei, where the KMT enjoyed stronger support, Chen said.
In southern Taiwan, 19 percent of respondents in Yunlin and Chiayi counties, as well as in Greater Tainan, said at least one of their family members was not able to return to their hometown to vote, which was 7 percentage points higher than the national average of 12 percent, Chen said, citing results of a post-election survey.
The committee’s meeting did briefly touch upon the party’s China policy, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) told reporters, adding there was no evidence indicating voters had decided not to support the DPP because of its refusal to accept the so-called “1992 consensus.”
However, the KMT and Beijing had successfully stigmatized the DPP as an anti-trade party and a party that opposes cross-strait engagement, Pan said.
“The DPP has always said it supports the normalization of cross-strait trade relations. Tsai Ing-wen also maintained that view when she served as chairperson of the Mainland Affairs Council,” Pan said.
Tsai is scheduled to deliver the final review to the party’s Central Executive Committee on Wednesday next week.
She steps down as chairperson on March 1.
DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: Taiwan shares the same values as those that fought in WWII, and nations must unite to halt the expansion of a new authoritarian bloc, Lai said The government yesterday held a commemoration ceremony for Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, joining the rest of the world for the first time to mark the anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe. Taiwan honoring V-E Day signifies “our growing connections with the international community,” President William Lai (賴清德) said at a reception in Taipei on the 80th anniversary of V-E Day. One of the major lessons of World War II is that “authoritarianism and aggression lead only to slaughter, tragedy and greater inequality,” Lai said. Even more importantly, the war also taught people that “those who cherish peace cannot
STEADFAST FRIEND: The bills encourage increased Taiwan-US engagement and address China’s distortion of UN Resolution 2758 to isolate Taiwan internationally The Presidential Office yesterday thanked the US House of Representatives for unanimously passing two Taiwan-related bills highlighting its solid support for Taiwan’s democracy and global participation, and for deepening bilateral relations. One of the bills, the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, requires the US Department of State to periodically review its guidelines for engagement with Taiwan, and report to the US Congress on the guidelines and plans to lift self-imposed limitations on US-Taiwan engagement. The other bill is the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which clarifies that UN Resolution 2758 does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan or its people in
US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo on Friday expressed concern over the rate at which China is diversifying its military exercises, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Saturday. “The rates of change on the depth and breadth of their exercises is the one non-linear effect that I’ve seen in the last year that wakes me up at night or keeps me up at night,” Paparo was quoted by FT as saying while attending the annual Sedona Forum at the McCain Institute in Arizona. Paparo also expressed concern over the speed with which China was expanding its military. While the US
‘FALLACY’: Xi’s assertions that Taiwan was given to the PRC after WWII confused right and wrong, and were contrary to the facts, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday called Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) claim that China historically has sovereignty over Taiwan “deceptive” and “contrary to the facts.” In an article published on Wednesday in the Russian state-run Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi said that this year not only marks 80 years since the end of World War II and the founding of the UN, but also “Taiwan’s restoration to China.” “A series of instruments with legal effect under international law, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration have affirmed China’s sovereignty over Taiwan,” Xi wrote. “The historical and legal fact” of these documents, as well
RSS