President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) cross-strait policies in an interview published yesterday, saying that the main reason Tsai refused to accept the so-called “1992 consensus” is because she does not accept the Republic of China (ROC).
“The ‘one China’ in ‘one China, with each side having its own interpretation’ refers to the Republic of China,” Ma was quoted as saying in his interview with the Chinese-language China Times on Thursday. “Why does she [Tsai] not accept it? How hard can it be? If she can’t accept it then that means that she does not accept the Republic of China.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government says that the “1992 consensus” was reached during cross-strait talks in Hong Kong in 1992, with both sides agreeing that there is “one China, with each side having its own interpretation.”
The DPP says the “1992 consensus” does not exist.
In the interview, Ma focused on the issue of cross-strait policies. He not only insisted that the “1992 consensus” was not a made-up term, but added that he had twice asked former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to accept the “1992 consensus” and met with a positive response, only to have it blocked by Tsai, then serving as the chairperson of the Mainland Affairs Council.
Referring to Tsai’s proposal of a “Taiwan consensus,” which highlights the democratic process of decisionmaking, Ma accused Tsai and the DPP of claiming that -everything must be subject to democratic processes only because they are against the “1992 consensus.”
The basis for current interaction across the straits is “democratic processes,” Ma said.
“Our definition of ‘one China’ in the ‘1992 consensus’ is the ROC,” Ma was quoted as saying in the interview. “Does that need to be submitted to a democratic process? Do we need to vote again on the name of the nation?”
“Just what kind of democratic process has to be gone through?” Ma asked, adding that if the DPP was not happy with the term “1992 consensus,” then the matter could easily be resolved by changing the term to “one China, different interpretations.”
“Things are generally only named after the fact. The 823 Artillery Bombardment wasn’t called that when it began; its not like we all decided to agree to have a artillery battle on Aug. 23,” Ma said.
Cross-strait relations should be based on “mutual denial of each other’s sovereignty and mutual non-denial of respective jurisdictions,” Ma said, adding that in the process of current cross-strait relationships, it was preferable to retain a small gray area while actually getting some things done.
Ma also said that if one treated the ROC as a government-in-exile, then nothing further could be said on the subject, adding that Tsai had this kind of “psychological disorder.”
In response to Ma’s criticism that Tsai “does not accept the Republic of China,” DPP caucus whip Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) yesterday accused Ma of “deliberately seeking to malign Tsai Ing-wen,” saying that she was running for the presidency of the ROC and had previously stated that “the ROC is Taiwan.”
Tsai Ing-wen only refused to acknowledge the “1992 consensus” under the “one China principle,” Tsai Huang-liang said.
“I hope that Ma apologizes for such unbefitting slander,” he added.
DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) also said that Tsai Ing-wen had said many times before that “Taiwan is the ROC, and the ROC is Taiwan.”
“Whether it is that Ma does not understand what Tsai Ing-wen is saying, or he is deliberately manipulating the issue of national recognition and causing tension between different groups,” Chen Chi-mai said.
“I cannot condone Ma’s manipulation of the issue,” the spokesperson said.
Chen Chi-mai said there must be a democratic system to focus the “Taiwan consensus” established on the basic principles of democracy, equality, and peace.
“By focusing on the ‘Taiwan consensus’ we can then start a dialogue with China through a variety of levels and channels, and only then can we establish a long-term and durable cross-strait mechanism,” Chen Chi-mai said.
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
One of two tropical depressions that formed off Taiwan yesterday morning could turn into a moderate typhoon by the weekend, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Tropical Depression No. 21 formed at 8am about 1,850km off the southeast coast, CWA forecaster Lee Meng-hsuan (李孟軒) said. The weather system is expected to move northwest as it builds momentum, possibly intensifying this weekend into a typhoon, which would be called Mitag, Lee said. The radius of the storm is expected to reach almost 200km, she said. It is forecast to approach the southeast of Taiwan on Monday next week and pass through the Bashi Channel
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
RSS