As of today, commercial sex work within red-light districts designated by local governments is legal in Taiwan, as lawmakers yesterday voted to support the motion proposed the Executive Yuan.
With the Sunday deadline approaching — set by the Council of Grand Justices two years ago to address the unconstitutionality of Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法) that penalizes only prostitutes and not their clients — lawmakers voted for the amendment presented by the government and supported by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus.
On Nov. 6, 2009, the Council of Grand Justices in Constitutional Interpretation No. 666 found Article 80 in violation of the spirit of equality embodied in the Constitution and ruled that the article be invalidated within two years.
According to the amendment, people who engage in the sex trade outside red-light districts, both sex workers and customers, as well as those who sell or buy sex in public, face a fine of NT$30,000.
The amendment also allows procurers and brothel owners to operate in red-light districts, while they could be fined between NT$10,000 and NT$50,000 respectively, and be held in detention for three to five days, if they work outside the designated areas.
In opposition to the proposal, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Huang Sue-ying (黃淑英) put forward an amendment seeking to follow the Swedish model, which criminalizes customers, but not sex workers.
Her proposal was voted down 40 to two, with the two “yes” votes cast by herself and DPP Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮).
The 32-member DPP caucus supported Huang in putting forward the amendment, but did not require its members to show up and vote against the 72-seat KMT caucus, which cast 41 ballots yesterday.
After the vote, Huang expressed “regrets” that the government and the KMT followed the “Dutch model, which has proved a big failure,” while rejecting the Swedish model that has seen the sex industry decline.
The passage of the amendment “provided legal protection for men to fulfill their sexual needs by giving them the right to go whoring” and “throws women back [to rely on] on their own resources [for protection],” Huang said.
It would also exacerbate the problem of human trafficking, Huang added.
Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), in charge of drafting the government-proposed amendment, opposed Huang’s proposal on the grounds that the Swedish model, in which clients are prosecuted and sex workers are not, could render the amended article unconstitutional.
Huang said that Jiang was wrong about the meaning of the equality principle in the Constitution.
“Equality means equality in essence and not equality in form. Women are at a more disadvantaged position than men, who are not prosecuted. Men have to pay for the social costs they cause,” she said.
She said the KMT government failed to see and pursue the values embodied in the Swedish model. According to this model, “women should not be viewed as sexual objects or have a price tag put on them.”
“Legalizing the sex trade would worsen human trafficking and discrimination against women, and the sex industry should not be regarded as a means to boost industry,” she added.
KMT Legislator Pan Wei-kang (潘維剛) said legalizing the sex trade in red-light districts “did not compromise our goal to gradually eliminate the sex industry.”